• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** 4th Test at Melbourne, 26-30 Dec 2024

Spark

Global Moderator
Tests we've blown since Sandpapergate:

* Leeds 2019
* Sydney 2021
* Brisbane 2021
* Karachi 2022
* Delhi 2023
* Leeds 2023
* Brisbane 2024

and now quite probably this Test.

How many Tests can you say we've won when hopes were looking glum? Edgbaston 2023 perhaps but even then I don't think hopes were as grim for us as things were for the opposition in those Tests. I suppose Melbourne last year was a 50/50 we won in tight circumstances, but not quite the same thing (and we were hot favourites in that Test). Also perhaps Adelaide 2020 you could say things weren't looking great, but it wasn't quite the level of advantage lost that some of the other ones were.

And maybe we could defend 250, but I don't have much faith unless Starc or Cummins goes full super saiyan.
2nd Test against NZ this year definitely counts, and Brisbane this year definitely doesn't
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The uneven bounce has definitely become more pronounced and it feels like ball is still moving at the 37th over. It's hard to compare with India's innings because Cummins was overpitching a ton early and starc just bowled rubbish.
Yeah I think that's a fair point. India 1st innings were getting the ball to talk a bit too, but then Konstas put them back in the shells. And while I think Australia bowled fine with the old ball, they didn't use the new ball as well as they should've. Now India have found a way to use the new ball and....
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah I think that's a fair point. India 1st innings were getting the ball to talk a bit too, but then Konstas put them back in the shells. And while I think Australia bowled fine with the old ball, they didn't use the new ball as well as they should've. Now India have found a way to use the new ball and....
This ball ain't new any more
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is actually 50-50 atm. Can hardly believe it given where they were early yesterday.

India won’t be comfortable chasing 200+, let alone 300 if Australia can stitch something together.

Facing Boland in these conditions will be a nightmare.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
And surely, shielding Cummins from Bumrah is not the best play, I understand Boom is on a roll and all but strangely defensive for a home team no? And Australia have a healthy lead and well ahead of the game even now.
 

Skyliner

International Debutant
You expect the odd one to keep low on Day 4, more so on Day 5. Surely a straight bat and ensuring there is no gap between bat and pad are fundamentals. Your technique should be adequate for the challenge of test cricket. This constant scrutiny of the pitch does not happen when Australia are piling on runs, as that is seen as ‘the norm’. You never hear ‘gee this pitch is flat as a pancake’ when Smith or Head are compiling a big first innings hundred.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Tests we've blown since Sandpapergate:

* Leeds 2019
* Sydney 2021
* Brisbane 2021
* Karachi 2022
* Delhi 2023
* Leeds 2023
* Brisbane 2024

and now quite probably this Test.

How many Tests can you say we've won when hopes were looking glum? Edgbaston 2023 perhaps but even then I don't think hopes were as grim for us as things were for the opposition in those Tests. I suppose Melbourne last year was a 50/50 we won in tight circumstances, but not quite the same thing (and we were hot favourites in that Test). Also perhaps Adelaide 2020 you could say things weren't looking great, but it wasn't quite the level of advantage lost that some of the other ones were.

And maybe we could defend 250, but I don't have much faith unless Starc or Cummins goes full super saiyan.
It's this kind of thing that annoys me. Every time there's a bit of pressure but a bit of application would put the match firmly in their grasp, they go to water.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
It's those sort of performances why people continue to criticise him - with reason. When he's having a bad spell it's like he's playing for the opposition.
Marsh is the problem. It means Starc and Cummins get overbowled and the former in particular has a long history of dropping off badly when overbowled. We can all talk around it, but the all-rounder position whether Green or Marsh or someone else is absolutely critical to the balance of this team unless it's an actual turner, and playing a nonentity in that position causes a dozen other problems to radiate out over the rest of the attack (as well as making the batting order look very short).
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Marsh is the problem. It means Starc and Cummins get overbowled and the former in particular has a long history of dropping off badly when overbowled. We can all talk around it, but the all-rounder position whether Green or Marsh or someone else is absolutely critical to the balance of this team unless it's an actual turner, and playing a nonentity in that position causes a dozen other problems to radiate out over the rest of the attack (as well as making the batting order look very short).
Its true but you are also not addressing the fact that Lyon being off the boil is also what is causing this issue. You played the same 4 bowlers without an AR for a fair while too and it was never a problem then coz Lyon bowled so many overs.
 

Top