I have given you enough stats earlier about it in this same thread to prove that's not true.In ODIs he has been doing pretty well(maybe not as consisitently as he was doing earlier) but nevertheless at a pretty decent average.He is again in a lean patch in these last two-three series, but that's all.Rik said:Yes they all had bad runs, but Nasser's only lasted a season, Ganguly's has lasted the last 2 or 3 years...
Those stats showed what I said was true. Apart from a few series, Ganguly has not scored many runs. Actually the only 2 series I can remember him scoring well in in the last 2 years are in England last year and against Bangladesh...aussie_beater said:I have given you enough stats earlier about it in this same thread to prove that's not true.In ODIs he has been doing pretty well(maybe not as consisitently as he was doing earlier) but nevertheless at a pretty decent average.He is again in a lean patch in these last two-three series, but that's all.
Before you write, I would recommend that you do some research of your own to back up what you are saying. Here's those stats again..... and remember we are talking about ODIs only which is clearly mentioned in my previous post which you quoted in your reply as well.Rik said:Those stats showed what I said was true. Apart from a few series, Ganguly has not scored many runs. Actually the only 2 series I can remember him scoring well in in the last 2 years are in England last year and against Bangladesh...
Well no one wins as yet again I was talking about Tests...now get it? Why would I say he's got a poor record in ODIs? Whenever we talk about this I am talking about Tests and you mention ODIs. Please don't bombard me with stats that I've seen before and prove nothing as they are about ODIs not Tests...now you know I'm talking about Tests give me some stats to show that Ganguly deserves his spot...aussie_beater said:Before you write, I would recommend that you do some research of your own to back up what you are saying. Here's those stats again..... and remember we are talking about ODIs only which is clearly mentioned in my previous post which you quoted in your reply as well.
2000/01 -
========
(P)18 (R)810 (H)144 (A)50.62 (100)3 (50)4
2001/02 -
=======
(P)20 (R)941 (H)127 (A)49.52 (100)2 (50)6
For specific series stats recently, in the last two years, here it is -
Against WI in WI
3 136 56 45.33 0 1
Against SA in SA
4 245 127 61.25 1 1
Against Zim in Ind
5 189 86 37.80 0 2
Against Zim in Zim(2001)
2 87 85 43.50 0 1
Now you tell me, who is proven right and who is proven wrong by the stats.
If you take his last 4 series,Rik said:Well no one wins as yet again I was talking about Tests...now get it? Why would I say he's got a poor record in ODIs? Whenever we talk about this I am talking about Tests and you mention ODIs. Please don't bombard me with stats that I've seen before and prove nothing as they are about ODIs not Tests...now you know I'm talking about Tests give me some stats to show that Ganguly deserves his spot...
If he keeps failing I will keep bashing him. But fair enough from what you've shown me. India cannot afford another bad series from him though, and I wouldn't mind seeing Dravid as Captain.anilramavarma said:If you take his last 4 series,
Against
WI in WI: 53.66
Eng in Eng: 58.50
WI in India: 12.25
NZ in NZ: 7.25
Of this, the home series against WI saw him falling to some horrendous umpiring decisions. In fact the only time he was fairly dismissed in the series was in the Eden Gardens test after scoring 29. So, the poor average in that series shouldn't really count against him. So, actually the latest NZ series was the only really bad one for him in recent times. Taking the above into consideration, especially the fact that most Indian batsmen failed in NZ, he isn't exactly at the write-off stage right now.
Taking into account the bowling resources at our command, India cannot afford another bad series from any of its batsmen, especially abroad.Rik said:If he keeps failing I will keep bashing him. But fair enough from what you've shown me. India cannot afford another bad series from him though, and I wouldn't mind seeing Dravid as Captain.
Well I'd just say that you should be clear about what you are talking about when you reply to someone's post and actually quote that post as well, and then talk about a totally different context from what was referred to in the post that you replied to in the first place.I am no psychic to know what is in your mind and I am not too intelligent either to read between the lines.Rik said:Well no one wins as yet again I was talking about Tests...now get it? Why would I say he's got a poor record in ODIs? Whenever we talk about this I am talking about Tests and you mention ODIs. Please don't bombard me with stats that I've seen before and prove nothing as they are about ODIs not Tests...now you know I'm talking about Tests give me some stats to show that Ganguly deserves his spot...
Not if he's still wicketkeeping...Rik said:and I wouldn't mind seeing Dravid as Captain.
AgesFrontierPsychiartrist said:My God, how long has this forum been going 4?
He's a superb OD bowler, but Test cricket is a learning experiance. You can't really expect someone of his age and experiance to work out that you have to bowl slower on some pitches when he's played only about 30 FC games, he's still learning. Imagine what would have happened if Nasser had actually caught Smith...Andre said:I'm tempted to say James Anderson, infact I'm very close, but I'll refrain for the moment.
If he's being used to take wickets (which he seems to be able to do quite regularly in ODI's) we can afford him a bit of leeway, especially the way Flintoff's been bowling in ODI Cricket.Craig said:Anderson has a problem with accuracy in ODI cricket.
Parthiv Patel is a very good 'keeper and a useful batsman. At what point did he get rated so much as to be over-rated?Jacques Rudolph said:4. P Patel
Was he ever really rated?3. R Peterson