• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Joe Root vs Dravid

Better Bat

  • Joe Root

    Votes: 23 54.8%
  • Dravid

    Votes: 19 45.2%

  • Total voters
    42

ma1978

International Debutant
Dravid has a pretty ordinary record in Aus and only one good series out of four.
This is irrelevant. Dravid played the fulcrum role winning India tests in Adelaide and Perth. The rest of his record is an irrelevance. You have to judge players by their contributions to legacy, not by stats. And in this way Dravid has a legacy in Australia, Root doesn't (and for an English player, its disqualiying from the pantheon without a legacy in Australia)
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
This is irrelevant. Dravid played the fulcrum role winning India tests in Adelaide and Perth. The rest of his record is an irrelevance. You have to judge players by their contributions to legacy, not by stats. And in this way Dravid has a legacy in Australia, Root doesn't (and for an English player, its disqualiying from the pantheon without a legacy in Australia)
This is called special pleading. Just pick his best two performances and ignore a dozen other tests, including being an absolute fail against McWarne.

Still we can give Dravid an edge in Aus but he is far from a success there.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
This is called special pleading. Just pick his best two performances and ignore a dozen other tests, including being an absolute fail against McWarne.

Still we can give Dravid an edge in Aus but he is far from a success there.
no - this is how legacies are created. Churchill was an epic failure for much of his life / political career but got the two big things right.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
no - this is how legacies are created. Churchill was an epic failure for much of his life / political career but got the two big things right.
That was quite a big piece of ****. Frankly, just doesn't get enough hate that mother****ing ****** deserves. A ****ing piece of thrash, the mid 1900s equivalent of Leopold.
 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
Dravid failed against the two best teams of his era
vs Aus & SA - 4 centuries in 102 innings
vs Rest - 32 centuries in 184 innings
 

Johan

International Captain
Root has a more patchless records while having less minnow games, a weaker lineup, tougher home conditions and a tougher era. Seems very clear cut to me.

love Dravid tho, no lesser than Ricky and Jack to me (@capt_Luffy)
 

Johan

International Captain
England fans in general overrate their players too much tbh
Eh, far less so then Indians and Pakistanis I'd argue, you won't see English fans defend Kohli if he was english, and Pakistani fans just straight up undermine the achievements of the opposition whenever one of their pacers is compared to someone else.
 

Johan

International Captain
I've been looking into the records of Kallis/Ponting and other 2000s great bats and a lot of my perception of them has fallen off the cliff tbh but I'll see where the fab 4 lands with the same scrutiny.
 

Johan

International Captain
Eh, far less so then Indians and Pakistanis I'd argue, you won't see English fans defend Kohli if he was english, and Pakistani fans just straight up undermine the achievements of the opposition whenever one of their pacers is compared to someone else.
@PlayerComparisons also would argue the Kiwi lads are pretty unhinged on this site.
 

Top