• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Gary Sobers vs Steven Smith

Gary Sobers vs Steven Smith


  • Total voters
    37

Narayana

U19 Cricketer
I don’t rate Atkinson that highly (test batting around the world is really weak atm)

I think Robinson would be unplayable on those spicy Aus pitches like Boland though. They need to pick him and Leach over Bashir.
Overtone is bowling 145+ kmph at the moment, they might pick him
 

DrWolverine

International Regular
Bradman was undoubtedly the best batsman of his era and light years ahead of his peers unlike Sobers whose contemporary was just as good as him.
 

DrWolverine

International Regular
Jacques Kallis>Brian Lara and Sachin Tendulkar tier take

The difference between Don & Hammond is huge. The difference between Lara & Kallis is small.

The difference between Sobers & Barrington during his playing days wasn’t that much. Ken was unfortunate to have had a late start & premature retirement.
 

Narayana

U19 Cricketer
The difference between Don & Hammond is huge. The difference between Lara & Kallis is small.

The difference between Sobers & Barrington during his playing days wasn’t that much. Ken was unfortunate to have had a late start & premature retirement.
If sobers is considered as a better test batsmen than Barrington only because of longevity, then why Kallis is not considered as better test batsmen than sobers?
168 test vs 98/100 test.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
If sobers is considered as a better test batsmen than Barrington only because of longevity, then why Kallis is not considered as better test batsmen than sobers?
168 test vs 98/100 test.
Sobers is considered better than Barrington because Sobers was far more dominant and flamboyant, plus Sobers played for 20 years from 1954 to 1974 while Kallis for 18.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
what? he only had problems in New Zealand


also, in the series where Sobers murdered Fazal, Fazal singlehandedly bowled Pakistan to a win in the final test taking 8/108
so Sobers averages higher in India and England while Barrington in Australia and Pakistan, and obviously New Zealand

don't really know what's that supposed to say
Gary's are better against Ind, Pak and England (WI is the competition for Ken in comparision), while Ken's against Australia and New Zealand.
who remembers NZ
 

Top