morgieb
Request Your Custom Title Now!
That was kinda my point - that you couldn't ever justify Holland over O'Keefe let alone Lyon.Not sure he's been ahead of O'Keefe for any of that period tbh
That was kinda my point - that you couldn't ever justify Holland over O'Keefe let alone Lyon.Not sure he's been ahead of O'Keefe for any of that period tbh
One problem with this is that its difficult to believe that anybody who actual bowls is not party to the tampering, as they are all integral to looking after the ball....Think as long as Lyon isn't linked to the ball tampering etc... his place is probably the most secure of any player in the side right now. Had a brilliant couple of years has 300 wickets and is young enough to comfortably reach 450+ and spinners usually keep improving into their 30's so he is the right age anyway. Why throw away the years of perseverance with him when he has suddenly been rewarding that.
Well I can't see all the attack plus Smith, Warner and Bancroft being banned/blamed. It would be a massive shock to everyone if they all got punished by CA.One problem with this is that its difficult to believe that anybody who actual bowls is not party to the tampering, as they are all integral to looking after the ball....
O'Keefe also has some batting in his stead (average of 27), though he's never translated it to international level when given the chance(except for his epic stonewall). I think Holland has a pretty poor reputation as a fielder too. I think it's his tendency to alcohol-iduced incidents that has pushed him back in sectors minds. Very hard to justify picking Holland ahead of him on cricketing grounds.That was kinda my point - that you couldn't ever justify Holland over O'Keefe let alone Lyon.
True if it had been tape. Double sided sandpaper would be pretty rough on the handBancroft should have used double-sided tape and stuck the thing permanently in the palm of his hand: no pocket removals and rubbing the ball would look completely innocuous. Typical Australians: nowt between the ears (even when they are up to their usual dark arts).
I`m interested to see what happens to Warner... obviously Smith lost the captaincy and has been banned, but Warner in a similar boat? Don't believe Bancroft deserves a ban. Lehmann should just be fired if for no other reason than bringing a culture into the Aus team that just appears toxic.Well I can't see all the attack plus Smith, Warner and Bancroft being banned/blamed. It would be a massive shock to everyone if they all got punished by CA.
Who knows, it may happen but I think Smith, Warner and Lehmann will be the ones that carry the can for this and the rest just get severe warnings about their future conduct.
Just because they handle the ball does't mean they're the ones actively doing it or even being party to it, especially with Lyon not being the beneficiary of the action. There's lots of things that can alter the condition of the ball, even within overs. Would someone necessarily notice a little extra scuffing compared to what comes from the pitch? He does seem to be on the inner circle which increases the chance of him being party to it.One problem with this is that its difficult to believe that anybody who actual bowls is not party to the tampering, as they are all integral to looking after the ball....
Aww poor gullible Bancroft.Here's what match referee Andy Pycroft had to say about Bancroft:
"To carry a foreign object on to the field of play with the intention of changing the condition of the ball to gain an unfair advantage over your opponent is against not only the Laws, but the Spirit of the game as well," he said. "That said, I acknowledge that Cameron has accepted responsibility for his actions by pleading guilty to the charge and apologising publicly. As a young player starting out in international cricket, I hope the lessons learned from this episode will strongly influence the way he plays the game during the rest of his career."
Hang on...it's not like Bancroft has only played 8 games of cricket in his life. The rules were exactly the same when he was a schoolboy, a grade cricketer, a State cricketer...He's played hundreds of matches over a long long period of time. Now all of a sudden he's gullible, naive or stupid because he's new to playing Tests? Give me a break - if anything, it should be exactly the opposite.
Other cricketers have been banned for lesser offences by ICC. Harbhajan Singh (despite being Harbhajan Singh) had a point in his rant where he mentioned that the current punishment meted out to Bancroft (75% of match fee) is lesser than what he got for showing dissent at umpiring decision (75% match fee and a match ban).I`m interested to see what happens to Warner... obviously Smith lost the captaincy and has been banned, but Warner in a similar boat? Don't believe Bancroft deserves a ban. Lehmann should just be fired if for no other reason than bringing a culture into the Aus team that just appears toxic.
'Cept he should have already learnt it...long long ago...Pycroft mentioned his age and inexperience in the context of hoping Bancroft will learn a lesson from the episode.
AKA a typical Australian childhood then'Cept he should have already learnt it...long long ago...
It would have been drilled into him - don't cheat. Just don't.
Unless he grew up under the very close influence of someone who said, "Yeah - go right ahead and cheat. It's fine!"
Don't see how Smith can ever again be taken seriously as a senior in the side tbh.Other seasoned members of the team who have been involved in the team’s leadership group at different stages – Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Nathan Lyon – have privately denied any involvement in the plot and there has been dissatisfaction that they were effectively thrown under the bus and unfairly tainted.
Oh yes it would be a real shock the bowlers might have known that the ball was being tampered with, and/or actually been party to a discussion on how to get the ball moving?https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...est-bancroft-escapes-ban-20180325-p4z670.html
Don't see how Smith can ever again be taken seriously as a senior in the side tbh.Other seasoned members of the team who have been involved in the team’s leadership group at different stages – Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Nathan Lyon – have privately denied any involvement in the plot and there has been dissatisfaction that they were effectively thrown under the bus and unfairly tainted.