sayon basak
International Captain
Oh I thought it was a cricketers ranking.He rates him 15th, Kyear 9th
(you should be happy as he rates Trumper at 14)
Oh I thought it was a cricketers ranking.He rates him 15th, Kyear 9th
You were so rightJesus christ talk about being blinded by one or two good series.
#RandomKiwiMitchell to England 2022
even I won't have Hutton over Hobbs, it's that crazy of a take.It's one of the better ones. He has much worse
You had once tho. I said it's not crazy by his standardseven I won't have Hutton over Hobbs, it's that crazy of a take.
Sunny vs 80s Windies (Quaret doesn't exist frankly)Sunny only faced the WI pace quartet in one series, 1983. Averaged 30....
I did kind of consider the possibility and I'm ashamed of doing so. I apologise to the forum for even mentally entertaining such profane and blasphemous thoughts.You had once tho. I said it's not crazy by his standards
I mean, if there's someone who can complain the least of his list it's me. He rates Grace at 2 and close to Don, Gavaskar at 3 and Trumper top 15!!! WAG List if anything!!Oh I thought it was a cricketers ranking.
(you should be happy as he rates Trumper at 14)
tbh I feel pretty good about the list as well, as I rate Barry and Ranji quite highly as well.I mean, if there's someone who can complain the least of his list it's me. He rates Grace at 2 and close to Don, Gavaskar at 3 and Trumper top 15!!! WAG List if anything!!
if you consider the numbers of 70s when either holding or Roberts played, even though those tests were played entirely on slow wickets, those guys were masters on slow wickets, including 70s runs.Sunny vs 80s Windies (Quaret doesn't exist frankly)
745 @ 41.33, whatever criticism of consistency or pitches, that's a good record.
average is wrongif you consider the numbers of 70s when either holding or Roberts played, even though those tests were played entirely on slow wickets, those guys were masters on slow wickets, including 70s runs.
Gavaskar: 1,243 @ 42.86, 5 tons.
net positive
wait how?average is wrong
By 2 things:wait how?
So you need to apologize.By 2 things:
A) Firstly I entered Marshall so 78 got included
B) Then I forgot of the 2 games he played in 74
soooooo...... Yeah
I apologise.So you need to apologize.
RIPBy 2 things:
A) Firstly I entered Marshall so 78 got included
B) Then I forgot of the 2 games he played in 74
soooooo...... Yeah
Edit: Actually in the opposite order
Played a good knock in 2 games. Not necessarily Great, but no point in poking as wellRIP
tho Yeah I think it's the 2 games from 74-75 that led to it being 42.8 instead of 45 odd, well I include that series simply because Roberts was having one of the best serieses by a touring pacer to Asia, 32 wkts in 5 games at average of 18 and strike rate under 40, I'd sing praises of Gavaskar if he made big runs against Robets and Gibbs that series so kinda have to include it (played a decent knock anyway). so I'm doing 74-75, 76, 83 and 84.
Yeah his record against WI is completely fine imo, actually very good if anything, 40+ against that lineup is very good, and he did it while opening and making 5 big tons, what was said about the knock.Played a good knock in 2 games. Not necessarily Great, but no point in poking as well
it sounds like he actually managed to push Roberts back in middle of his ATG series, which is a feat.Solkar made his first Test century, a dogged, drab innings, but one which India could hardly have done without. Gavaskar made a delightful 86, playing superb shots against Roberts, who could not summon his full pace, and who tended to overpitch