I feel the same way about Conrad, his test selections have been all over the place, if he doesn't win this series I think he should come under pressure..I'm very much in the to be convinced Stubbs is a number 3 in test cricket. He was looking okay but that's a nothing defensive shot with an angled bat.
It's not the same thing, but when he made his triple century he batted at 4 but came in quite early (the score was only 20). So it's not like he's had no experience against a newish ball, but that was against KwaZulu-Natal Inland and the West Indies are a different prospect.Stubbs gone , has he ever batted at no.3 in red ball cricket in domestic cricket ?
Who bats 3 if you go with this lineup? Both openers can but it isn't like Bavuma would take that gig and you are not messing with Bedingham. You can put Rickelton there, but I suspect he is there as they don't fancy Verreynne.I feel the same way about Conrad, his test selections have been all over the place, if he doesn't win this series I think he should come under pressure..
A lot of square peg in round hole selections..
They also cited mental well-being when at the same time he was playing cricket in the US.Apart from the T20 WC and a couple of games in January, he hasn't played any international cricket. He's only been involved in T20 comps and domestic stuff so resting him from internationals to manage his workload just sounds weird to me.
Never, but they clearly rate him.Stubbs gone , has he ever batted at no.3 in red ball cricket in domestic cricket ?
Big ask to do it in your second test lol
No. This is very much a thrown in the deep end let him learn because he is that talented. Time will tell. Just as long as they give him a proper run.Stubbs gone , has he ever batted at no.3 in red ball cricket in domestic cricket ?
Big ask to do it in your second test lol
There was an article that looked at his workload and it was more than you realise. And the vast majority of it was actually for SA itself.Apart from the T20 WC and a couple of games in January, he hasn't played any international cricket. He's only been involved in T20 comps and domestic stuff so resting him from internationals to manage his workload just sounds weird to me.
None of the SA supporters understand it. Probably the coach couldn't make up his mind between the batsmen so played them all. Dropping the extra bowler.Meanwhile RSA are playing two wicketkeepers 6-7 and a batting allrounder at 8.
Ha! It's like we've gone the opposite way after having Jansen at 7 when we felt like we went in with a batsman light.None of the SA supporters understand it. Probably the coach couldn't make up his mind between the batsmen so played them all. Dropping the extra bowler.
I wouldn't go with this lineup , but if I did it would have to be De Zorzi , who has batted at no.3 in domestic and test cricket before ..Who bats 3 if you go with this lineup? Both openers can but it isn't like Bavuma would take that gig and you are not messing with Bedingham. You can put Rickelton there, but I suspect he is there as they don't fancy Verreynne.
What I would like to see is the Mulder, Verreynne, Jansen at 6,7,8 for a period of time and see how they go. Or else pick Rickelton and then have Rickelton, Mulder and Jansen at 6,7,8. But pick one and stick with it for a few tests.Ha! It's like we've gone the opposite way after having Jansen at 7 when we felt like we went in with a batsman light.
Same. Think we need to go 7/4 split even when Jansen is back.What I would like to see is the Mulder, Verreynne, Jansen at 6,7,8 for a period of time and see how they go. Or else pick Rickelton and then have Rickelton, Mulder and Jansen at 6,7,8. But pick one and stick with it for a few tests.