subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
And Pakistan? He performed on dead pitches there.you’re proving his point by including South Africa and England there
And Pakistan? He performed on dead pitches there.you’re proving his point by including South Africa and England there
im not here diminishing any cricketer’s achievements nor do I wish to thoughAnd Pakistan? He performed on dead pitches there.
Again, don't derail and get back to the point of being reasonable.What series will be hailed and remembered in 2030 from India at home in the 2010s?
2017-18 when Australia toured just for 1What series will be hailed and remembered in 2030 from India at home in the 2010s?
The SA series when Ashwin and Jadeja turned Ab De Villiers and Amla into Boycott and Tavare basically. That was memorable in itselfWhat series will be hailed and remembered in 2030 from India at home in the 2010s?
Yeah maybe because of Smith but I will concede on that being a great series.2017-18 when Australia toured just for 1
That may not be remembered for bowling skill but pitch quality.The SA series when Ashwin and Jadeja turned Ab De Villiers and Amla into Boycott and Tavare basically. That was memorable in itself
It is a reasonable position that foreign away triumphs will define the era and be more memorable than home ones unless it is against a strong opposition like India-Australia 2001.Again, don't derail and get back to the point of being reasonable.
And yet, Kumble was missing in 2001 triumph against Australia. He couldn't win a series against them in down under in 2003-04 and was a mute spectator when we were fried at home in 2004-05. Didn't win any series in Eng, NZ or SA through his career. India had to wait until his retirement to win something in NZ in 2008-09. Home bullying was his hallmark. And yet, you consider him to be a better bowler than Ashwin.It is a reasonable position that foreign away triumphs will define the era and be more memorable than home ones unless it is against a strong opposition like India-Australia 2001.
But not an ATG.And yet, Kumble was missing in 2001 triumph against Australia. He couldn't win a series against them in down under in 2003-04 and was a mute spectator when we were fried at home in 2004-05. Didn't win any series in Eng, NZ or SA through his career. India had to wait until his retirement to win something in NZ in 2008-09. Home bullying was his hallmark. And yet, you consider him to be a better bowler than Ashwin.
Haha, true. Funnily, I don't remember any of his bowling from that series, apart from the only hundred he scored and the hilarious way he escaped a stumping on the verge of it.But not an ATG.
Btw they won in Eng with Kumble in 2007.
He actually bowled well in the test they won and scored a ton in another game, from what I recall.Haha, true. Funnily, I don't remember any of his bowling from that series, apart from the only hundred he scored and the hilarious way he escaped a stumping on the verge of it.
Yes, they were cute(and impactful) 3 fors I agree.He actually bowled well in the test they won and scored a ton in another game, from what I recall.
Yeah hehe.Yes, they were cute(and impactful) 3 fors I agree.
That wasn't your point though so don't lie again. And India has been good enough to be the best side for a while and he's been pivotal to that.It is a reasonable position that foreign away triumphs will define the era and be more memorable than home ones unless it is against a strong opposition like India-Australia 2001.
My point was that Ashwin wont be remembered in the future except by Indian fans whereas Cummins will because he is on course to be an ATG.That wasn't your point though so don't lie again. And India has been good enough to be the best side for a while and he's been pivotal to that.
No I am actually quite reasonable and several times I have reversed my opinion based on evidence, check the Steyn vs Ambrose thread, or given conciliatory messages for players I seem to harshly critique, such as the Ashwin ATG thread. Unfortunately, there is a tendency towards groupthink and reactionary replies among several of you. Maybe you all enjoy jousting with me.It is futile to argue with subz. The quicker you guys understand it, the better.
The rabbit he caught always has only three legs.
which has also been refuted with multiple responses to which you have been ignorant or shot down because it doesnt suit your narrativeMy point was that Ashwin wont be remembered in the future except by Indian fans whereas Cummins will because he is on course to be an ATG.
How is it reasonable? If I say the opposite, how is that argument any more valid? It's stupid from top to bottom.My point was that Ashwin wont be remembered in the future except by Indian fans whereas Cummins will because he is on course to be an ATG.