ataraxia
International Coach
grrDon't think klassan is a test #3 long term but he looks a good bat, hopefully he gets a longer run down the order.
grrDon't think klassan is a test #3 long term but he looks a good bat, hopefully he gets a longer run down the order.
But continuing to do the same thing badly will suddenly make everything better? I would rather give the players an opportunity to test themselves and prove themselves than just say, you to young. It is such a player to player thing to see how they will react to situations. Some will thrive some won't.I understand you are very frustrated, but I don't believe for a second the complete rebuild you are advocating for has any chance whatsoever of working in the manner you think. Rather than players initially failing but building in confidence and kicking on in 2-3 years as you say, what is infinitely more likely those early failures weighing said players down to the point where it would almost be cruel to keep selecting them, and then whoever eventually replaces them would then go into exactly the same cycle, rinse and repeat. I fundamentally do not believe putting players, especially those with little experience, into such sink or swim situations will ever be a beneficial thing towards their careers
And this is still true regardless of the method you pick to try fix the situation... so yes a fundamental level of requirement, whatever direction you go, is that the CSA as an organisation needs to dramatically improve.Also you mention support, and honestly nothing about CSA as an orginisation gives me any faith they can provide that
No-one in this thread is advocating for doing the same thing. This is a silly straw man.But continuing to do the same thing badly will suddenly make everything better?
My entire point is the chances if any single player actually thriving decreases dramatically the more you ask from them early on. I know you don't see it that way, but I wholeheartedly believe you are 100% setting players up for failure by going down that pathBut continuing to do the same thing badly will suddenly make everything better? I would rather give the players an opportunity to test themselves and prove themselves than just say, you to young. It is such a player to player thing to see how they will react to situations. Some will thrive some won't.
And what experience does Bavuma and Elgar provide for young players?... we not talking Amla, Faf, Kallis, ABdV or Smith in the team passing on good advice. We talking Elgar and Bavuma. Neither have shown high enough competence at this level that provides the sort of leadership and experience required. And nobody is advocating for 19 year olds. I`m talking about players who are 23-27 years of age. And SA has plenty of experience and knowledge available to players sitting in coaching positions, consultancy and ex-players that have said openly they are willing to help. It just requires actually being used correctly. And that requires the CSA to actually be sensible and do things right and give them opportunity to help.
And this is still true regardless of the method you pick to try fix the situation... so yes a fundamental level of requirement, whatever direction you go, is that the CSA as an organisation needs to dramatically improve.
What do you think the current teams entire selection policy is based on?... the need for experience. They are literally ignoring the younger less experienced players. You guys are advocating keeping Bavuma and Elgar over what I want. Bavuma I`m ok with for multiply reasons. But I don't see the point of keeping Elgar at this stage. I literally do not see what he is bringing to the team at this stage.No-one in this thread is advocating for doing the same thing. This is a silly straw man.
Klaasen would be amazing in England's team , just that in this SA team with no identity and no confidence he's conformed to the conservative approach , this innings a classic example I think he was run a ball for his first 20 runs , got bobbed down and out for 35 in 61 . If he's to have a successful Test career he has to play to his strengths.. Smashing the cricket ball to all parts like he does for the TitansDon't think klassan is a test #3 long term but he looks a good bat, hopefully he gets a longer run down the order.
There's a massive difference between picking two experienced guys vs picking six and it's kind of disappointing to see you constantly conflate the twoWhat do you think the current teams entire selection policy is based on?... the need for experience. They are literally ignoring the younger less experienced players. You guys are advocating keeping Bavuma and Elgar over what I want. Bavuma I`m ok with for multiply reasons. But I don't see the point of keeping Elgar at this stage. I literally do not see what he is bringing to the team at this stage.
I am not saying that what you propose is not the more ideal circumstance, it is exactly what I was advocating 4 years ago while players I mentioned were still around... unfortunately that time has passed, and that method iof doing things is no really available and for me keeping players on that are more of a detriment to the future, just makes it worse. So this is what I`m advocating in this less than ideal situation.My entire point is the chances if any single player actually thriving decreases dramatically the more you ask from them early on. I know you don't see it that way, but I wholeheartedly believe you are 100% setting players up for failure by going down that path
No arguments on the second bit of the post though
In the video there was no clearance between the surface of the ball and the grass (real time it was a clean catch, I agree).Sorry, I know you caught that ball at knee height but your fingers were split and that's enough for a not out decision now.
Just absolute junk logic
A different two experienced guys and I would agree with you. In this line-up of fc 'experience' Bavuma and Elgar are still the only guys that have real Test experience. So the entire point of keeping them on is not because they may be the best choices but because they are literally the only choices. Even if not good enough. And that is where I have a problem, I literally don't think that they provide enough overall to actually make a difference.There's a massive difference between picking two experienced guys vs picking six and it's kind of disappointing to see you constantly conflate the two