AB not close, Amla is as good but different era. If you are just going purely on current batsmen he is for sure up there with them as are a few others.AB, Amla....
AB not close, Amla is as good but different era. If you are just going purely on current batsmen he is for sure up there with them as are a few others.AB, Amla....
KW averages nothing in South Africa or England, and apparently unless you score runs in every country you are terrible according to the above logic so I guess he isn't any good either.
Of course, making 134 when the opposition has been bowled out for 60 is the definition of easy.Runs in Australia is probably not the main point. I just feel like only one of the "big 3" have consistently made tough runs when required. Of course you can cop a ball in any innings that would get you out. But in terms of class I need to see more from Joe.
I think he's got a great demeanor and obviously can make big scores. So for me, not there yet but has the talent
Of course, the other team being crap doesn't mean he's an undisputedly great player.Of course, making 134 when the opposition has been bowled out for 60 is the definition of easy.
People keep saying this but sides keep turning up here and consistently lose 20 wickets nearly every test match. Odd.weak trolling effort.
As if making runs in ****ing Australia is the mark of a good batsmen. Flattest pitches known to man.
You're plainly talking about the Imposter AB here, and not the One True AB.AB not close, Amla is as good but different era. If you are just going purely on current batsmen he is for sure up there with them as are a few others.
you keep bringing up this point but other teams also lose because the Aus attack can take 20 wickets on those (as well as other wickets). Their attack is half decent when the main bowlers are fit. Besides its not like visiting batsmen haven't cashed in on flat wickets. They have gotten runs, just not as many the Aussies.People keep saying this but sides keep turning up here and consistently lose 20 wickets nearly every test match. Odd.
what?you keep bringing up this point but other teams also lose because the Aus attack can take 20 wickets on those (as well as other wickets). Their attack is half decent when the main bowlers are fit. Besides its not like visiting batsmen haven't cashed in on flat wickets. They have gotten runs, just not as many the Aussies.
Even Bravo and both Brathwaites averaged 50 there thoPeople keep saying this but sides keep turning up here and consistently lose 20 wickets nearly every test match. Odd.
in 2 testsEven Bravo and both Brathwaites averaged 50 there tho
This is a weird argument mate.you keep bringing up this point but other teams also lose because the Aus attack can take 20 wickets on those (as well as other wickets). Their attack is half decent when the main bowlers are fit. Besides its not like visiting batsmen haven't cashed in on flat wickets. They have gotten runs, just not as many the Aussies.
If making runs in Australia is so easy, why does Root average 25 over here?weak trolling effort.
As if making runs in ****ing Australia is the mark of a good batsmen. Flattest pitches known to man.
Yeah especially when you play against great sides like thisPeople keep saying this but sides keep turning up here and consistently lose 20 wickets nearly every test match. Odd.
Listen mate, the big 3 are all beyond reproach. Root, Williamson and Smith are legit great players a tier or two above the rest.
And that's still below tier 1.AB, Amla....
This is a really bad argument and it really annoys me when people them. This is what happens when people who don't actually watch the game then go on to cricinfo and glance over the scorecard. Here is some homeworkSuch a wuss, is he going to make some runs in Australia? Even New Zealand? He's made 10 tons, 8 of which are in England/Wales. The other 2 were against a Steyn-less SA (still ok, but not the same really), and the other against Windies. He needs some decent runs in tough conditions against the best.
I recall one of those games from that series. Australia declared twice, India for within about 80 then declared(I it a triumph).Yeah especially when you play against great sides like this
1st Test: Australia v West Indies at Hobart, Dec 10-12, 2015 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
Against India the year earlier you struggled to take 20 wickets and failed to win 2 games as a result
I recall one of those games from that series. Australia declared twice, India for within about 80 then declared(I it a triumph).
Was mostly a troll response to Jmay's point tbh. 2013/14 you had peak Johnson and the wickets were better for bowling than what they have been over the last two years AFAIC.Yeah people talking about Roots average in Aus is just ridiculous.....he's played 4 tests there in the early part of his career FFS.
You can rank the Fab 4 anyway you want but the fact is he is included in that group and ****ing deserves to be too.........anyone saying he is a rung below is just talking bollocks.