Thing is, the reason it used to be a CW joke about Siddle "running in all day" is because it really was just a stupid cliche by stupid commentators. Sure he was more durable than many other Aussie quicks, but he actually took wickets just as regularly as anyone. Nowadays isn't an issue of Australia not needing his type of bowler, it's more just to do with the fact he hasn't bowled very well for the last year or so.I always said Siddle would play this test, but in a side with Marsh, Watson and Lyon, what the benefit of 'running in all day' is over Haze has always been a bit beyond me. Interesting to see Bing and Warne start saying exactly the same as I type.
(makes me doubt my own sanity frankly)
It's not hate it's constructive destructionI don't think Siddle deserves all this hate..
He's not the one going at 7 an over..
not watching, but do you mean the one that swung in then seamed away that owned Cook?Shows Ryan Harris highlight reel.
Doesn't show his greatest delivery ever.
Good job channel nine.
Fixed that for you, and the answer is very far.How far is Tom Cooper from playing for Australia in test cricket?
It also masked the fact he was a very skilful bowler at his peak, who didn't earn 190-odd Test wickets simply by 'running in all day'Thing is, the reason it used to be a CW joke about Siddle "running in all day" is because it really was just a stupid cliche by stupid commentators. Sure he was more durable than many other Aussie quicks, but he actually took wickets just as regularly as anyone. Nowadays isn't an issue of Australia not needing his type of bowler, it's more just to do with the fact he hasn't bowled very well for the last year or so.
nah being **** until T20 cricket saved him is why he isn't an ATGJust putting it out there that Harris' knee has robbed him of being an ATG.
Harris, Johnson, Patto/Cummins and Twatto is an attack made of glass. I know Hazlewood has had his problems too but not sure what his recent record is like.It also masked the fact he was a very skilful bowler at his peak, who didn't earn 190-odd Test wickets simply by 'running in all day'
But the thing is, he possibly earns himself an extra run in the side through lean times by appearing to do exactly that.
Well yeah he used to suck but he's been world class for years and only managed 25 tests.nah being **** until T20 cricket saved him is why he isn't an ATG
Nah ****.nah being **** until T20 cricket saved him is why he isn't an ATG
siddle wouldnt have played at brisbane, and wontI always said Siddle would play this test, but in a side with Marsh, Watson and Lyon, what the benefit of 'running in all day' is over Haze has always been a bit beyond me. Interesting to see Bing and Warne start saying exactly the same as I type.
(makes me doubt my own sanity frankly)