• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Fourth Test at The Oval

nsniks

State Vice-Captain
So the question is will the match would be over by lunch tomorrow or our lower order can extend it to second session????
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Been out at a driving lesson. Switched on and Jimmy bowling Laxman was the first thing I saw. Absolutely top drawer.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Well for one the clarity of those images would be pretty poor and for another they would also find it harder to control what particular images they wanted to see. They'd have to ask the 3rd umpire to rewind to a certain scene and freeze on a certain spot and it would be incredibly clumsy.
Yeah I suppose you are right.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
After all that's been said, Dravid has just said on Sky that he did get a edge on it, world class bloke that Dravid.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Finally a day when England have been made to work in the field. We will still win of course and Tendulkar got a lifeline so i hope he gets the 100th 100 tomorrow as long as we complete the whitewash. Swann has done ok, got 4 massive wickets of top order players in the match so he has done his job, hopefully he can get 3 more tomorrow.

Dravid, what a guy. Would have been even easier if it wasn't for him. Class act.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Dravid's just confirmed he thought he feathered it in his interview with Ward on Sky.

I tend to agree, but not sure there was enough to overturn the original NO tho. Benefit of the doubt to the batsman and all.
 

hazsa19

International Regular
Dravid's just confirmed he thought he feathered it in his interview with Ward on Sky.

I tend to agree, but not sure there was enough to overturn the original NO tho. Benefit of the doubt to the batsman and all.
'Benefit of the doubt' doesn't extend to giving someone not-out when they hit the ball.
 

Top