• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** New Zealand in Australia

Flem274*

123/5
Oh yeah Athlai, we have done far better than expected, mainly with the ball. Our batting has looked promising for mine. Our batsmen definitely seem to be able to cope against good bowlers and get through tough periods when they first come to the crease. They are getting starts but not going on with it, but I think that will come with more test experience. I'm actually looking forward to the West Indies series, I think we can do well.
Only for short periods of time, then comes the ******** shot or a very good ball which is too good.

If we can pile on 400+ here (which I doubt) then I'll be happy, even if we are playing on a road.
 

Polo23

International Debutant
So in other words he'll only score runs at Napier this summer?

*sigh*
Either it is the flat pitch, or he has turned the corner in terms of batting in test matches. I hope for NZ's sake it is the latter..he definitely is looking more confident.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Oh yeah Athlai, we have done far better than expected, mainly with the ball. Our batting has looked promising for mine. Our batsmen definitely seem to be able to cope against good bowlers and get through tough periods when they first come to the crease. They are getting starts but not going on with it, but I think that will come with more test experience. I'm actually looking forward to the West Indies series, I think we can do well.
Call me John. :happy:

My constant backing of Taylor has paid off. So I'm pleased. Southee had that one ripper of a session and O'Brien has proved his worth with the ball.

A half decent second innings will conclude what has been a half decent tour for me all round.
 

KiWiNiNjA

International Coach
Oh yeah Athlai, we have done far better than expected, mainly with the ball. Our batting has looked promising for mine. Our batsmen definitely seem to be able to cope against good bowlers and get through tough periods when they first come to the crease. They are getting starts but not going on with it, but I think that will come with more test experience. I'm actually looking forward to the West Indies series, I think we can do well.
Yeah, they need to value their wicket more.

And to learn how to apply themselves.

And to come out after a break and not lose wickets.

And to turn over the strike better so pressure isn't mounted up so easily.

etc etc
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Have to say I've noticed a bit of it - but after listening to the nonsense served up by Bruce Yardley and friends in the Bangladesh series, I'd happily rather hear cricket related banter, even if its a little off topic from the test, from the Channel Nine team. And to be fair, you can't expect to analyse every delivery in depth, it'd just get tedious. A little humour or banter between the commentators is entertainment, and thats part of the Channel Nine package.
A little banter is fine. When the commentators completely ignore a batsman hitting a 4 for instance, that isn't.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Bruce Yardley would make a good Channel 9 commentator tbh:

Ian Healy: "Australia are magnificent, get Lee up here! He's my lover!"

Richie: "The makingo f Symonds was when...."

Tony Grieg "Ar, we hav the best commontery in the world, ar"

Chappel "*grumble about field placement*"

Yardley "play some shots! You've only got a SR of 120! Ya too slow!"
 

KiWiNiNjA

International Coach
Oh has anyone else noticed that the Channel 9 commentators hardly ever seem to do any commentating. They'll just take 5 minute breaks from the game to fart on to each other about their agonisingly uninteresting anecdotes, and just completely ignore what's going on, out on the park. Then eventually, presumably because some hopelessly depressed broadcaster pokes them with a stick, they'll wake up and make some incredibly insightful comment like "Well Australia will probably be wanting to extend their lead over New Zealand." Leaving aside for a moment their extraordinary bias, I don't honestly know if there is a worse team going around, purely in terms of actual commentating.
Yeah, agreed.

They could do with a visiting commentator to mix things up a bit.

I think Ian Smith really ruined it for visiting commentators, now they just go with Nicholas because they know he will play along.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Wasn't there someone from India when they were over there? I'm sure there was..

Should've invited Crowe, he could have punched Healy for us after a ridiculously biased argument from both sides. Then Taylor could have punched Crowe.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Crowe was actually surprisingly good on the radio yesterday, though I think that had more to do with the fact that he wasn't really commentating, more just discussing the general situation in New Zealand Cricket, and a couple of the big issues in the world game.
 

KiWiNiNjA

International Coach
Radio ones only. David Trist=gun.
Jeremy Coney would be great.

But Ian Smith would also be good, I loved it how he commentated the last time in Aus. He wasn't affraid to try and even out the bias.

Now with Nicholas, they have found someone who will just go along with their bias, and not even make things interesting.
 

Top