Pratters
Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Nah. It was a one hand effort which might have been a casual effort, as the commentators put it.Daym, not off his own bowling I hope?
Nah. It was a one hand effort which might have been a casual effort, as the commentators put it.Daym, not off his own bowling I hope?
was off Tom Smith itbtDaym, not off his own bowling I hope?
Kemp's not coming this year, it's Hall and Arafat, the latter of whom is doing a decent rebuilding job with Walker at the moment. Watch him get out now...My tip to do well this season Kent are having another nightmare it would seem. Things will get considerably better when Kemp and Hall arrive but its sheer absurdity that Darren Stevens is starting in front of Dexter.
meanwhile Ramprakash and Butcher have both got out to Oli Newby
he's actually bowling pretty well according to the radio, all the batsmen seem to be troubled by him.
News to me I thought Kempy was coming back this year but anyways Yasir Arafat has just completed his century and taken Kent (with the help of Matt Walker) out of the mire.Kemp's not coming this year, it's Hall and Arafat, the latter of whom is doing a decent rebuilding job with Walker at the moment. Watch him get out now...
Oh really?Not neccessarily - there are any number of decidedly mediocre Kolpak and EU-passport players around who do little to improve the standard but take one hell of a lot of money out of the team paying them.
Very decent comeback, disappointedly, Surrey are all for 283 with all of Newman's and Batty's good work gone to waste.158-4 now, decent comeback for Lancs.
It's completely farcical once again. Wouldn't be surprised if neither team get to their second innings. Absolutely daft.Predictable run buffet down at Taunton
One could say he has bombed the league...Much better day from Kent after another poor start. Arafat looks like he could turn out to be an excellent signing.
It's a question of equations - if someone's very slightly better and costs far more, a county is still likely to sign him because of short-term interests dominating.Oh really?
If they weren't better players (or cheaper options) - they wouldn't be signed because there would be absolutely no point in signing them (especially since there's a loss of funding from playing them)
Keep the Lancashire puns out of the Kent equation...One could say he has bombed the league...
And out of interest, how do you know that they cost far more?It's a question of equations - if someone's very slightly better and costs far more, a county is still likely to sign him because of short-term interests dominating.
It's far better for the general good of the English game, though, to spend far less money and settle for slightly less good players.