• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Would England have won the 2005 Ashes without ball tampering?

Would England have won the 2005 Ashes without ball tampering?


  • Total voters
    36

Ali TT

International Vice-Captain
Interesting the different reactions among the English and Australians re: ball tampering.

Aussies get banned and English get MBE’s
Don't moan at us because your whole ****ing nation went through some self-flagellating, performative bullshit about upholding the "spirit of cricket" when you suddenly realised that your cricketers were the dodgy ***** the rest of the world already knew they were.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Don't moan at us because your whole ****ing nation went through some self-flagellating, performative bull**** about upholding the "spirit of cricket" when you suddenly realised that your cricketers were the dodgy ****s the rest of the world already knew they were.
Intense response. Didn’t mean to hit a sore spot.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I wonder if when literally everyone on this forum is dead there will still be Australian folk crying about the 2005 Ashes
 

Kirkut

International Regular
A better question should be - Would England have won the Ashes in 2005 if McGrath was not injured midway?

Sure, England did use reverse swing very well and mints may have played a role, but there was no banana swing which should make reverse swing the single greatest factor in that series. England won because they won more mini battles or moments than Australia did, not that Flintoff and Jones swung it huge and sent stumps flying all the time.
 

Coronis

International Coach
A better question should be - Would England have won the Ashes in 2005 if McGrath was not injured midway?

Sure, England did use reverse swing very well and mints may have played a role, but there was no banana swing which should make reverse swing the single greatest factor in that series. England won because they won more mini battles or moments than Australia did, not that Flintoff and Jones swung it huge and sent stumps flying all the time.
I mean, that’s not even a question, the two matches McGrath missed were the two England won.
 

Ashes81

State Vice-Captain
I mean, that’s not even a question, the two matches McGrath missed were the two England won.
You're right it's not even a question because injuries are part and parcel of the game.

We won the series 2-1 because over the 5 tests we were the better team.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Rain saved Oz in the third which he played, and the fifth was also a draw (England were the better side in that also but part of that was the weather and series situation forcing Australia’s hand)
Obviously we’re in complete hypothetical mode here but no way was McGrath in 100% shape 1 week after rupturing two ligaments in his ankle. (or even for the rest of the series tbh) But it is what it is sadly. (for Australia)

We still got one of the most entertaining series of all time so I’m glad for that.
 

Aidan11

International Vice-Captain
The last time I had this much fun was when I diarrhoea'd on a farm field and accidentally soaked a litter of kittens, resulting in their mother biting my leg in a non-playful way.
 

Top