marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
Again, pre-change.Scallywag said:He also averages over 45 against SA.
Again, pre-change.Scallywag said:He also averages over 45 against SA.
But isn't that the main reason why sides are picked?Top_Cat said:Form is temporary, class is permanent and SRT outclasses all three of those players any day of the week and twice on Sundays with both hands tied behind his back (maybe not Lara.......). Picking a side purely on form has been shown time and time again to be bone-headed in the extreme. It seems like an attractive idea but it just makes players uncertain about their place in the side which inevitably results in losing. Look through history at sides picked on form alone and you'll see.
Doesn't that kind of gives your side a lack of balance though? Two mainstream quicks, one specialist spinner, and two batting all-rounders IMO (batting being their strongest point) to make up the rest of the attack?garage flower said:Find it strange that no-one's picking Sehwag in the test side. Mine would be:
Sehwag
Smith
Dravid
Lara
Kallis
Thorpe
Flintoff
Pollock
Taibu
Murali
Harmison
Reserves:
Laxman, Tendulkar, Oram, McCullum, Pathan, Kumble
It does a bit, I must admit, but I think that - based on his current form - Flintoff is good enough to be regarded as a specialist bowler and Kallis is still a useful 5th bowler. I don't think there are any many other (fit) world class bowlers (outside Australia) around at the moment.Craig said:Doesn't that kind of gives your side a lack of balance though? Two mainstream quicks, one specialist spinner, and two batting all-rounders IMO (batting being their strongest point) to make up the rest of the attack?
no the reason why i chose boucher/read is that both of them are capable of stop-start innings.....with the strength of that batting linup you would expect the no 7 to only come in only around over 46 and i dont think taibu has really established himself as a 'slogger'. in terms of wicket keeping ability i dont think read or boucher are that far behind eitherMr Mxyzptlk said:There's no reason for him to displace Taibu though. Taibu has accomplished more and is also an outstanding 'keeper.
no he is not.....ntini has more often than not failed against the quality batting sides. his bowling is one dimensional and he is extremely overrated.arjwiz said:I'll have a go at the teams.
Test Team
1. Graeme Smith (captain)
2. Marvan Atapattu
3. Rahul Dravid
4. Sachin Tendulkar
5. Brian Lara
6. Jacques Kallis
7. Mark Boucher (wicket keeper)
8. Shaun Pollock
9. M.Ntini
10.Anil Kumble
11.Muttiah Muralitharan (Harmison, if Murli refuses to tour)
Ntini is the best fast bowler today (non-Aussie), so enough said.
yes i think hes a good pick....he was an integral part of that 'leave everything that mcgrath bowls' strategy that worked so very successfully on their last tour of australia.Kent said:Richardson in a six-day test! I can't say it's something I'd like to see, but it's something I'd like to be told about afterwards...
why is sarwan an automatic pick in tests?Deja moo said:Sarwan is an automatic pick for me in both forms of the game.
You're right, he isn't, though he is coming up on the rails and would probably make the one day XI.tooextracool said:why is sarwan an automatic pick in tests?
Why Razzaq? He does nothing with the ball these days. And with a lineup that figures Chris Cairns at no.10, there is no need for another all-rounder. Ntini in place of Razzaq, IMO.biased indian said:ODI team
Gayle
Shewag
Jayasuriya
Kallis
Styris
Flintoff
Razzaq
G.Jones
Pollock
Cairns
Kumble
all except kumble will Bat well i needed a spinner and he was ecnomical
Not the language you'd expect form a wisden writer!Shite, wasn't that? And to think we call ourselves cricket writers
tooextracool said:why is sarwan an automatic pick in tests?
rajat said:I think Ganguly should be made the ODI Captain. He is also a good batsman