Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
By what definition?Cricket batting isn't a real sport.
By what definition?Cricket batting isn't a real sport.
I have. I don't consider cricket besides fast bowling to be a real sport. It's a game of skill. That's it. I gave you my opinion.Kindly respond to the points I made instead of just typic for the sake of it.
That is not response to any of the questions I asked. Kindly respond.Cricket batting isn't a real sport.
By what definition?
You're not just replying now, you're asking questions. Take a hintBro you keep saying that you will keep replying until people stop replying to you, but why? Do you really have that little going on in your life?
Or is it like a psychological issue, like you can't leave something unfinished, because I have met kids (and adults) like that, usually autism-related.
If it is a genuine psychological issue I apologise, but otherwise why don't you just shut down your computer/phone and go do something else? You're not making any friends or ingratiating yourself with anyone with your posting here right now. Your just embarrassing yourself. Take a break IMO.
Since when are sports not games of skill. I suppose it nullifies any of your points about Jackson considering that he required considerable skill in his sports to maintain a great but not legendary career as a running back, a less than special batting average and great out fielding ability.I have. I don't consider cricket besides fast bowling to be a real sport. It's a game of skill. That's it. I gave you my opinion.
I love cricket. I love chess. I love 500. But it's hardly a real sport.
You do realise that Inzamam had great hand eye coordination and was one of the best players of fast bowling? Guess what, he could face great test match fast bowling, Bo Jackson can't.
Warne or Tiger?I'm waiting for it to reach the point where the greatest athlete in history is judged purely by how much tail he pulls
I love games of skill. I appreciate the talents of those who win at games of skill. I even watch WSOP.Since when are sports not games of skill. I suppose it nullifies any of your points about Jackson considering that he required considerable skill in his sports to maintain a great but not legendary career as a running back, a less than special batting average and great out fielding ability.
@Mr. Miyagi: Await response to this also apart from the four points which are pending.I don't really care whose the better allround sportsman tbh, I'm just waiting for Miyagi to acknowledge the mistake he made in post #7900 of this thread, back on page 198 (@40ppp)
Cricket batting requires no skill as per the above post.I love games of skill. I appreciate the talents of those who win at games of skill. I even watch WSOP.
But if we're talking sportsmen, and including cricket batsmen, seems a lil lame to me.
Where's the sport? Hitting a 6 times every 5 minutes divided by 2?
I answered it in one.@Mr. Miyagi: Await response to this also apart from the four points which are pending.
No it requires skill. But it doesn't require athleticism, fitness, power, muscles, endurance, power, speed, strength, or anything else.Cricket batting requires no skill as per the above post.
lmao spot the guy whose never played cricket beforeNo it requires skill. But it doesn't require athleticism, fitness, power, muscles, endurance, power, speed, strength, or anything else.
Elyse Perry.What would be you AT XI of cricketers who excelled at other sports too?
Bradman and CB Fry aside, I'm guessing Drik Nannes and Jeff Wilson would feature, and I hope there would space for my personal favorite, M.J. Gopalan
Oh, and ABDV of course
I'm trying to help you man. This can't be fun for you.You're not just replying now, you're asking questions. Take a hint
Yeah. Never played cricket before. That's me. Mr no cricketlmao spot the guy whose never played cricket before