• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Steve Smith vs Sachin Tendulkar (after 205 innings)

Who is more impressive?

  • Steve Smith

    Votes: 17 45.9%
  • Sachin Tendulkar

    Votes: 20 54.1%

  • Total voters
    37

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
50-60 probably? In his final England series he batted with 51 SR, in 1969 it was also 50, in 1966 England it was 59 but it was the best series of his life, in 1963 England it was 45.
So a fair advantage over Hutton even if we give openers credit to be slower.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
So a fair advantage over Hutton even if we give openers credit to be slower.
True, but Hutton would cancel that advantage out due to the opener tax imo, opening in England is a far harder job than playing 4-5 on 50s/60s Windies wickets which were generally flat.

 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
Can I see your top 10? Just curious how you fit Gavaskar in the top 6-8.
1. Sachin
2. Sobers
3. Smith
4. Viv
5. Hutton
6. Lara
7. Gavaskar
8. Barrington
9. Kallis
10. Ponting


** Obviously Don is the best but not sure on how to rate or rank pre war cricketers
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
Viv over Sobers makes sense imo, tougher pitches, better opposition and genuinely better away from home.
 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
Viv over Sobers makes sense imo, tougher pitches, better opposition and genuinely better away from home.
Sachin. Viv. Sobers. Smith.
I have them on the same tier.
I usually have Sachin as first.
Viv has no weakness.
Sobers has longevity.
Smith seems to have no weakness in his record for now.

I would have rated Hutton higher but compared to the others he faced less ATG bowlers though he played in tougher conditions
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
Sachin. Viv. Sobers. Smith.
I have them on the same tier.
I usually have Sachin as first.
Viv has no weakness.
Sobers has longevity.
Smith seems to have no weakness in his record for now.

I would have rated Hutton higher but compared to the others he faced less ATG bowlers though he played in tougher conditions
don't really think Smith has performed against more ATGs than Hutton tbh
 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
Viv over Sobers makes sense imo, tougher pitches, better opposition and genuinely better away from home.
Viv easily faced better competition.

I have few issues with Sobers :
1. Playing a higher proportion of matches against Tier B teams but not exactly minnows.
2. That record against NZ. 12 Tests is a significant sample size as well.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
50-60 probably? In his final England series he batted with 51 SR, in 1969 it was also 50, in 1966 England it was 59 but it was the best series of his life, in 1963 England it was 45.
Sobers SR is listed at 52-53 by Davis.
 

Top