• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Racism - Social pariah or public consensus?

Complicated

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Ofcourse I comdemn the Nazi party. But you're taking this to an extreme and ignoring the spirits it's intended in, you can do that with any arguement, but it won't ever be very convincing.

The point I'm trying to make is I don't personally condemn every citizen of Germany living during the 1940's who was over 30 as being genocidial lunatics. That might be a convenient generalisation but probably ridiculously off base. And in the same vein its just as unsatisfactory to comdemn 'anglo' Australian's (or westerners) above 50 for being racist. I don't think is going anywhere though =) so I'll stop posting on this point.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Voltman said:
Errr, I think the word you were looking for was "ovine". :p
You let him pleasure what he wants.

This is, however, a cricket board, consequently the discussion on racism and bestiality ought to be kept within the confines of cricket. If not, the thread ought to be moved into 'Off Topic'.
 
Last edited:

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
James said:
I don't have a problem with this thread staying open providing the discussion is of a reasonable fashion.

All countries suffer from some form of racism, there's no escaping it unfortunately :(. You'll probably find that racists are un-educated un-employed idiots and people who I have no time for what so ever.
Well said. Why should it be considered significant when it involves Colour criterion .

There are other forms of racism based on differences of language , Culture , regionalism,secularism, oppression of women, wealth, power.. etc... some of these are far worse and involve life and death for those affected... I don't think any part of the world should think they are sacred or holier than others ... and point fingers...

It is just that some societies are open and we are able to discuss these while others keep these issues hidden in the closet .
 

C_C

International Captain
There are other forms of racism based on differences of language , Culture , regionalism,secularism, oppression of women, wealth, power.. etc... some of these are far worse and involve life and death for those affected... I don't think any part of the world should think they are sacred or holier than others ... and point fingers...
How is discrimination based on culture/region/secularism etc. be construed as racism ?
How is (for example) Denmark disliking Norway on cultural grounds be deemed racist ?
Race pertains to genetics- be it carrier of a certain genome or the fuzzier 'certain skin color/bone structure'.
All forms of discriminations are abhorrable but all forms of discrimination arnt racism.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
C_C said:
How is discrimination based on culture/region/secularism etc. be construed as racism ?
How is (for example) Denmark disliking Norway on cultural grounds be deemed racist ?
Race pertains to genetics- be it carrier of a certain genome or the fuzzier 'certain skin color/bone structure'.
All forms of discriminations are abhorrable but all forms of discrimination arnt racism.
As you say, racism is just another form of discrimination.

However, if you want to narrow the definition of racism to the nth degree, then of course countries like Aus appear more guilty than others.

Fortunately, most of the world has a more balanced view and recognises discrimination as a global problem, no matter what form it takes.
 

C_C

International Captain
However, if you want to narrow the definition of racism to the nth degree, then of course countries like Aus appear more guilty than others.
I am not narrowing it at all.
Racism pertains to race- definition of race is based ideally on genetics ( such as the case of Israeli racism) but often in accordance to skin tones/bone structure.

That is the definition of racism. A Pakistani guy yelling at another for being of a lower cast is not racism because for one they are of the same race and for two, the derogatory comments are not pertaining to race.

And yes, discrimination is a global problem- but some regions have far more trouble with the problem than others.
 

C_C

International Captain
Complicated said:
Ofcourse I comdemn the Nazi party. But you're taking this to an extreme and ignoring the spirits it's intended in, you can do that with any arguement, but it won't ever be very convincing.

The point I'm trying to make is I don't personally condemn every citizen of Germany living during the 1940's who was over 30 as being genocidial lunatics. That might be a convenient generalisation but probably ridiculously off base. And in the same vein its just as unsatisfactory to comdemn 'anglo' Australian's (or westerners) above 50 for being racist. I don't think is going anywhere though =) so I'll stop posting on this point.

I am not taking this to an extreme- i am merely asking you where the 'thin red line' is .
To what extent can one normalise behaviour simply because one hasnt experienced it personally ?
 

Langeveldt

Soutie
Interesting to see Haydos talk about copping it in South Africa..

That is if we get any crowds for the test matches, usually its pitiful, like being shouted at by three men and two dogs..

Interesting to see a lot of Aussie feedback on cricinfo about stones and glass houses.. I think a lot of Aussies seem to be forgetting the fact that they have a very racist history as well.. And it seems to be in continuing really.. Or maybe its just a vocal minority

BJ - Cricinfo said:
To me, most of the guys being taunted with "kaffir" comments appear to be Anglos who've spent some time at the beach. Go ahead and boycott, you goat - you need us MUCH more than we need you. And when it comes to racism ... well, there's a little something about stones and glasshouses
No prizes for guessing what BJ stands for..
 
Last edited:

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Langeveldt said:
Interesting to see Haydos talk about copping it in South Africa..

That is if we get any crowds for the test matches, usually its pitiful, like being shouted at by three men and two dogs..

Interesting to see a lot of Aussie feedback on cricinfo about stones and glass houses.. I think a lot of Aussies seem to be forgetting the fact that they have a very racist history as well.. And it seems to be in continuing really.. Or maybe its just a vocal minority



No prizes for guessing what BJ stands for..
Hopefully, the South Africans that have been hurling the racial abuse in Aus will return home for this test series and never darken our door-step again
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
social said:
Hopefully, the South Africans that have been hurling the racial abuse in Aus will return home for this test series and never darken our door-step again
I'm trying to get my head around the fact that they have travelled to Australia just to shout racial abuse at South Africans.

Then I look at the history of football hooliganism in England and it all becomes clear.
 

Jason_M

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
So what if you get called names while fielding in the outfield, there was a time when players just went along with it and had a laugh at the drunken idiot making a fool of himself, the fact that some of the SA players have complained says more about them than the fools on in the stands.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
luckyeddie said:
I'm trying to get my head around the fact that they have travelled to Australia just to shout racial abuse at South Africans.

Then I look at the history of football hooliganism in England and it all becomes clear.
They might very well be residents of Aus. Perth, in particular, has a large SA expat community.

However, the fact that the abuse was hurled in Afrikaans at both whites and coloreds and made reference to life in the "rainbow" communities of the colored townships can only draw one conclusion as to the origins of these "people."

The average Aus red-neck would be more likely to convey his feelings as follows:

glug, glug, "you black so-and-so", stumble, stumble, fall over.
 

Fusion

Global Moderator
social said:
They might very well be residents of Aus. Perth, in particular, has a large SA expat community.

However, the fact that the abuse was hurled in Afrikaans at both whites and coloreds and made reference to life in the "rainbow" communities of the colored townships can only draw one conclusion as to the origins of these "people."

The average Aus red-neck would be more likely to convey his feelings as follows:

glug, glug, "you black so-and-so", stumble, stumble, fall over.
Peter English in his article at Cricinfo bunks this RIDICULOUS excuse very soundly.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Fusion said:
Peter English in his article at Cricinfo bunks this RIDICULOUS excuse very soundly.
Get the SA team to change the basis of their complaint. They are the ones that complained about remarks made in Afrikaans.
 

C_C

International Captain
social said:
Get the SA team to change the basis of their complaint. They are the ones that complained about remarks made in Afrikaans.
People living on your shores are the responsibility of the nation of residence. If these south africans expats/immigrants should pack up and leave for hurling abuse in Afrikaans, the average redneck Aussie should be booted back to the british Isles.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
C_C said:
People living on your shores are the responsibility of the nation of residence. If these south africans expats/immigrants should pack up and leave for hurling abuse in Afrikaans, the average redneck Aussie should be booted back to the british Isles.
WTF?! After (possibly) 5 or 6 generations of antecedents born in Australia? I think not. Unless, of course, you're suggesting that dodgy conceptions of "blood" are the ultimate arbiters of nationality?
 

C_C

International Captain
BoyBrumby said:
WTF?! After (possibly) 5 or 6 generations of antecedents born in Australia? I think not. Unless, of course, you're suggesting that dodgy conceptions of "blood" are the ultimate arbiters of nationality?

I was being sarcastic. I dont believe that just coz one's lineage has been in the nation longer than another lifelong citizen's, it doesnt give the former a right to disparage others by statements such as ' Hopefully, the South Africans that have been hurling the racial abuse in Aus will return home for this test series and never darken our door-step again'
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
C_C said:
People living on your shores are the responsibility of the nation of residence. If these south africans expats/immigrants should pack up and leave for hurling abuse in Afrikaans, the average redneck Aussie should be booted back to the british Isles.
Don't you dare.

Have you seen the price of bread over here these days?
 

Top