You let him pleasure what he wants.Voltman said:Errr, I think the word you were looking for was "ovine".
Well said. Why should it be considered significant when it involves Colour criterion .James said:I don't have a problem with this thread staying open providing the discussion is of a reasonable fashion.
All countries suffer from some form of racism, there's no escaping it unfortunately . You'll probably find that racists are un-educated un-employed idiots and people who I have no time for what so ever.
How is discrimination based on culture/region/secularism etc. be construed as racism ?There are other forms of racism based on differences of language , Culture , regionalism,secularism, oppression of women, wealth, power.. etc... some of these are far worse and involve life and death for those affected... I don't think any part of the world should think they are sacred or holier than others ... and point fingers...
As you say, racism is just another form of discrimination.C_C said:How is discrimination based on culture/region/secularism etc. be construed as racism ?
How is (for example) Denmark disliking Norway on cultural grounds be deemed racist ?
Race pertains to genetics- be it carrier of a certain genome or the fuzzier 'certain skin color/bone structure'.
All forms of discriminations are abhorrable but all forms of discrimination arnt racism.
I am not narrowing it at all.However, if you want to narrow the definition of racism to the nth degree, then of course countries like Aus appear more guilty than others.
Complicated said:Ofcourse I comdemn the Nazi party. But you're taking this to an extreme and ignoring the spirits it's intended in, you can do that with any arguement, but it won't ever be very convincing.
The point I'm trying to make is I don't personally condemn every citizen of Germany living during the 1940's who was over 30 as being genocidial lunatics. That might be a convenient generalisation but probably ridiculously off base. And in the same vein its just as unsatisfactory to comdemn 'anglo' Australian's (or westerners) above 50 for being racist. I don't think is going anywhere though =) so I'll stop posting on this point.
No prizes for guessing what BJ stands for..BJ - Cricinfo said:To me, most of the guys being taunted with "kaffir" comments appear to be Anglos who've spent some time at the beach. Go ahead and boycott, you goat - you need us MUCH more than we need you. And when it comes to racism ... well, there's a little something about stones and glasshouses
Hopefully, the South Africans that have been hurling the racial abuse in Aus will return home for this test series and never darken our door-step againLangeveldt said:Interesting to see Haydos talk about copping it in South Africa..
That is if we get any crowds for the test matches, usually its pitiful, like being shouted at by three men and two dogs..
Interesting to see a lot of Aussie feedback on cricinfo about stones and glass houses.. I think a lot of Aussies seem to be forgetting the fact that they have a very racist history as well.. And it seems to be in continuing really.. Or maybe its just a vocal minority
No prizes for guessing what BJ stands for..
I'm trying to get my head around the fact that they have travelled to Australia just to shout racial abuse at South Africans.social said:Hopefully, the South Africans that have been hurling the racial abuse in Aus will return home for this test series and never darken our door-step again
They might very well be residents of Aus. Perth, in particular, has a large SA expat community.luckyeddie said:I'm trying to get my head around the fact that they have travelled to Australia just to shout racial abuse at South Africans.
Then I look at the history of football hooliganism in England and it all becomes clear.
Peter English in his article at Cricinfo bunks this RIDICULOUS excuse very soundly.social said:They might very well be residents of Aus. Perth, in particular, has a large SA expat community.
However, the fact that the abuse was hurled in Afrikaans at both whites and coloreds and made reference to life in the "rainbow" communities of the colored townships can only draw one conclusion as to the origins of these "people."
The average Aus red-neck would be more likely to convey his feelings as follows:
glug, glug, "you black so-and-so", stumble, stumble, fall over.
Get the SA team to change the basis of their complaint. They are the ones that complained about remarks made in Afrikaans.Fusion said:Peter English in his article at Cricinfo bunks this RIDICULOUS excuse very soundly.
People living on your shores are the responsibility of the nation of residence. If these south africans expats/immigrants should pack up and leave for hurling abuse in Afrikaans, the average redneck Aussie should be booted back to the british Isles.social said:Get the SA team to change the basis of their complaint. They are the ones that complained about remarks made in Afrikaans.
WTF?! After (possibly) 5 or 6 generations of antecedents born in Australia? I think not. Unless, of course, you're suggesting that dodgy conceptions of "blood" are the ultimate arbiters of nationality?C_C said:People living on your shores are the responsibility of the nation of residence. If these south africans expats/immigrants should pack up and leave for hurling abuse in Afrikaans, the average redneck Aussie should be booted back to the british Isles.
BoyBrumby said:WTF?! After (possibly) 5 or 6 generations of antecedents born in Australia? I think not. Unless, of course, you're suggesting that dodgy conceptions of "blood" are the ultimate arbiters of nationality?
Don't you dare.C_C said:People living on your shores are the responsibility of the nation of residence. If these south africans expats/immigrants should pack up and leave for hurling abuse in Afrikaans, the average redneck Aussie should be booted back to the british Isles.