Scaly piscine said:
And he averaged just over 30 against the toughest opposition he'll face in years, with only one of the five pitches that had anything in it for him whatsoever. Unlike Hoggard and Simon Jones Harmison does lots of the donkey work when the conditions aren't there for him. Harmison has basically had one bad series in the last couple of years and many good series.
Harmison still bowls too short in general and doesn't build the pressure he should.
The fact that he's simply not taking wickets with any regularity is telling. Yes, he bowled well in the West Indies last year. He then struggled when WI toured England, except for one innings.
Examine his figures against Australia. He took 5/43 in the first innings of the series. After that, he took 12 wickets at an average of 42.17. The length that he bowled may have caused some bruises and shaken up the batsmen, but it wasn't very effective otherwise. England can afford to carry Harmison around at the moment until he regains his form, but to say he would walk into any team in the world - rubbish.
Yes, he bowls with heart and determination, but so do Brett Lee, Fidel Edwards and Tino Best. They're not good enough (yet) either. Steve Harmison has shown that he can be a world class bowler, but he's more often shown that he isn't at this point in time.
If 138 Test wickets and a good series against Australia is the qualification for a world-class bowler who would walk into any side, what about Mervyn Dillon? 131 Test wickets isn't quite 138, but he took 16 wickets in 4 Tests (Harmison took 17 in 5) the last time WI toured Australia. He averaged less than 30 and (Harmison >30) Australia only lost 48 wickets in those 4 Tests. Of the 5 times Mark Waugh was dismissed in those 4 Tests, Dillon was the bowler on each occasion.
Would Dillon walk into any team in the world?