It's a chicken or egg thing. You can have a someone you think is good, but you won't know if they're better than who they're replacing until they actually play, and test players usually need a bit of time to step up.I guess the logic is to allow his replacements to cement themselves.
Maybe they should forget the Ashes for five minutes.Its a risk but if their only aim is to win the Ashes in Australia
I think so too but you know they wont.Maybe they should forget the Ashes for five minutes.
They wanted someone who can bosh sixes instead.Is Foakes unavailable?
Foakes, Bairstow, Robinson, Hartley etc have been dropped after the India tour. Terrible move imo as these are all exactly the guys I took in my fantasy draft for these testsIs Foakes unavailable?
woahFoakes, Bairstow, Robinson, Hartley etc have been dropped after the India tour.
fat, lazy, unmotivated, PR nightmare.woah
Don't think it's very wise dropping people based on a tour of India for a series in home conditions. I guess Bairstow's been having some poor returns since injury. Why Robinson though?
Difficult to manage aka a massive ****.woah
Don't think it's very wise dropping people based on a tour of India for a series in home conditions. I guess Bairstow's been having some poor returns since injury. Why Robinson though?
Is he though? Or is that just a media spin? He could easily be kept from doing interviews.fat, lazy, unmotivated, PR nightmare.
take your pick.