Smudge
Hall of Fame Member
Enjoy the job of selecting from an embarrassment of riches?marc71178 said:All well and good, but say they all perform brilliantly - what do the selectors then do?
Enjoy the job of selecting from an embarrassment of riches?marc71178 said:All well and good, but say they all perform brilliantly - what do the selectors then do?
Is it just me, or does everyone else feel like when they are spoilt for choice, they make the wrong decision?Voltman said:Enjoy the job of selecting from an embarrassment of riches?
And what sort of message does that give to the ones that have come in?sirjeremy11 said:I guess they do what they usually do here and go back through the old tried and tested. Look how many chances some of our guys (bar Sinclair) seem to get.
If at first you don't succeed, you will NEVER EVER get looked at again.marc71178 said:And what sort of message does that give to the ones that have come in?
sirjeremy11 said:Is it just me, or does everyone else feel like when they are spoilt for choice, they make the wrong decision?
ie Mills in the test team...
Don't worry. It's pretty hard to tell if someone's being sarcastic over the internet.sirjeremy11 said:No. I meant he seems to not be in top form...
Couldn't tell if you were being sarcastic.
Oh yeah, that was poor. Wonder what life had been like had they picked Butler...Blaze said:Yeah if it's a 50/50 pick, the selectors always seem to go for the opposite player that I would have.
i.e Mills over Butler in the Australia test
.
Point. Happened the tour before aswell. Cairns to Hayden. He got a hundred. Or was it Langer? He got a hundred too.Voltman said:Although I wonder what life would have been like had Mills been given one of those LBWs early on...
Not necessarily true.IndianByHeart said:I don't think this WI team will be able to make much of an impact in the comming WC 2007 on its own home ground.Its unfortunate to see WI struggling to find quality performers for their team.
I thought the statement was regarding Tests. Sarwan certainly does have a propensity to throw it away by going half-heartedly at balls outside off when seemingly well-set.Tim said:In ODI's? There are very few players averaging 50 in ODI's. Bevan managed to do it because he was batting and 6 ending alot of innings 'not out'.
He's at 43 I believe, it'll be difficult for him to go much higher than 45 if you ask me.
Sarwan averaged over 60 for a while in 2003. He was then moved higher up the order and didn't get as many chances to finish. He's certainly capable of averaging over 50 in ODI cricket though.Tim said:In ODI's? There are very few players averaging 50 in ODI's. Bevan managed to do it because he was batting and 6 ending alot of innings 'not out'.
He's at 43 I believe, it'll be difficult for him to go much higher than 45 if you ask me.
Scott Styris is in good form and is the most consistant batsman in NZ line-up at the moment dis regarding the last match. He think he performs well in the position hes in but I'm a bit worried about his bowling he been going for a few and its not really his role to be a major strike bowler so he should just try to keep the economy rate down.sirjeremy11 said:No. I meant he seems to not be in top form...
Couldn't tell if you were being sarcastic.
Ok. I was wrong. He never averaged over 60, but he averaged as high 57podd.Tim said:I'll believe it when I see it.
Yes, but it seems as if bowlers have worked him out and so his average has fallen accordingly. If he continually gets out playing at balls outside off-stump then you'd think that good bowlers (and coaches for that matter) would have picked up on it and so bowl in that area.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Ok. I was wrong. He never averaged over 60, but he averaged as high 57podd.
Sarwan averaged over 50 until his 41st ODI innings.
He averaged 48.68 after 67 ODI innings.
Surely it's not that hard to believe. You clearly underestimate the man.