Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
You must be tough to live with if you're so easily annoyed.superkingdave said:Is it me or is the grunt that Best emits when he releases the ball kind of annoying?
You must be tough to live with if you're so easily annoyed.superkingdave said:Is it me or is the grunt that Best emits when he releases the ball kind of annoying?
If Chanderpaul continues to look like he has better things to do than play Test cricket and Joseph is scoring runs...tooextracool said:true but it is hard to find technical flaws on a flat wicket.....and it would be foolish IMO to drop chanderpaul for joseph.
I agree, he did so many wrong things today.chris.hinton said:Giles days in the england setup are Numbered
I don't really understand what this is all about. It looks dreadfully like trying to take offence at any imagined slight. Not being given things which don't exist and have never existed doesn't seem to me to be any kind of insult at all. There is no such thing as an advance ticket for the fifth day of a Test match at Lord's, and hasn't been for as long as I can remember, so why the Windies team expected to be given them, I can't imagine.garage flower said:http://www.caribbeancricket.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1469
See above article (assuming I've done it right) for further evidence of the ECB's disgracefully disdainful attitude towards the West Indian touring party.
Let's hope this rank inhospitality is rammed back down English throats over the next few days.
I suppose the interesting question to come out of today is whether or not Lara's decision to field first was worse than Hussain's similar decision at Brisbane in 2002-3.shaka said:Brian Lara won the toss and decided to field first, what is up with that? Normally people want to bat first especially in the first test of the series. The Lord's track is not as quick as it normally is and with an inexperienced attack, this could be a large score could be set in Englands first innings. However Chris Gayle is an intelligent bowler.
In all fairness, Lara had the justification of overcast condition which cleared just before the start of play. Also the pitch supposedly had some juice in it.badgerhair said:I suppose the interesting question to come out of today is whether or not Lara's decision to field first was worse than Hussain's similar decision at Brisbane in 2002-3.
Cheers,
Mike
yep..apparently vaughan would have put WI in if he had won the toss today as well.Mr Mxyzptlk said:In all fairness, Lara had the justification of overcast condition which cleared just before the start of play. Also the pitch supposedly had some juice in it.
chris.hinton said:Giles days in the england setup are Numbered
Yes, I agree, that technique of his is absolutely abysmal.tooextracool said:of course there is....you dont pick a batsman who scores on a flat track over a proven test match batsman.
strauss continues his run of form at lords, although he does need to sort out that defence of his....
Yes, you cannot spot a technical flaw even if it jumped up and kicked you in the backside, and even though the flatness of a wicket doesn't affect the player in question's technique.tooextracool said:true but it is hard to find technical flaws on a flat wicket.....and it would be foolish IMO to drop chanderpaul for joseph.
Ah yes, 'Tresco only scores at the Oval' is back.tooextracool said:strauss continues his run of form at lords, although he does need to sort out that defence of his....
That was what Hussain said at Brisbane, too. The stories that Vaughan would have inserted as well tend to lower my estimation of Vaughan as an astute captain: I was at the ground when the toss was made, and when I saw Lara take first interview slot, I assumed they were batting. I couldn't believe it when it was announced that WI had decided to field, and neither could anyone else anywhere near me.Mr Mxyzptlk said:In all fairness, Lara had the justification of overcast condition which cleared just before the start of play. Also the pitch supposedly had some juice in it.Originally Posted by badgerhair
I suppose the interesting question to come out of today is whether or not Lara's decision to field first was worse than Hussain's similar decision at Brisbane in 2002-3.
They say he may have been swung by the overcast conditions that were present right before the toss as well as the history of the team batting second winning as well as the incidence of West Indian losses having batted first in three of the Tests in the Caribbean.badgerhair said:That was what Hussain said at Brisbane, too. The stories that Vaughan would have inserted as well tend to lower my estimation of Vaughan as an astute captain: I was at the ground when the toss was made, and when I saw Lara take first interview slot, I assumed they were batting. I couldn't believe it when it was announced that WI had decided to field, and neither could anyone else anywhere near me.
Cheers,
Mike
yeah and you were in the crowd, 80 yards from the pitch...the two captains could see the pitch right there in front of them.badgerhair said:That was what Hussain said at Brisbane, too. The stories that Vaughan would have inserted as well tend to lower my estimation of Vaughan as an astute captain: I was at the ground when the toss was made, and when I saw Lara take first interview slot, I assumed they were batting. I couldn't believe it when it was announced that WI had decided to field, and neither could anyone else anywhere near me.
Cheers,
Mike
you being serious????tooextracool said:of course there is....you dont pick a batsman who scores on a flat track over a proven test match batsman.
strauss continues his run of form at lords, although he does need to sort out that defence of his....
Quite frankly is England and West Indies continue as they did today, 400 not out is under threat. Imagine the headlines of Robert Key as world record-holder.Swervy said:Just wondering what WI need to do to get back into this game...remember last year at the oval SA 345 for 2 with about half an hour left on the first day..looked like game over SA win.
But SA were all out 484,and ended up losing by 9 wickets.
If WI can get the bowling together quickly tomorrow,and take all their chances..and restrict England to no more than 500..who knows..Lara might play a blinder and put England under pressure...you never know.
Maybe i am being super optimistic for WI..if England bat like today and WI bowl like today..England should see 700 by just after tea
Same thing happened at The 'Gabba when Hussain decided to bat first.badgerhair said:That was what Hussain said at Brisbane, too. The stories that Vaughan would have inserted as well tend to lower my estimation of Vaughan as an astute captain: I was at the ground when the toss was made, and when I saw Lara take first interview slot, I assumed they were batting. I couldn't believe it when it was announced that WI had decided to field, and neither could anyone else anywhere near me.
Cheers,
Mike
In what series did Hussain decide to bat first at the Gabba? Presumably a different one to the one in which he made his decision to bowl first and to which I referred.Mister Wright said:Same thing happened at The 'Gabba when Hussain decided to bat first.