luckyeddie said:Well, he is a bit of a sweetie, but I think he's a little too mature for you.
u wish! better SL than SA in the finals, eh mate?Nnanden said:And predictably Sri Lanka don`t really accelerate, and end up with about 286.
Go Lanka! Go Bandara!
Not really. Think of Australia during the World Cup final in 1996. Having wickets in hand is all very well but it's not always easy to convert that into big scores. I have seen it happen on many occasions. Still the Sri Lankans will probably be disappointed with their score and with the likes of Kemp,Boucher and Pollock , SA definitely has a solid chance. Should be a pretty good game.2/144 after 24 overs with any other Team would mean 320 plus at 50 overs.
I normally go the underdog, and I don`t like the Saffie team at all really.dinu23 said:u wish! better SL than SA in the finals, eh mate?
JASON said:Sri Lankans showing how inept they are at even converting a good start into a winning 300 plus score.
2/144 after 24 overs with any other Team would mean 320 plus at 50 overs.
This score 281 is below par on this track and with SA's long batting lineup and Sri Lanka's inept bowling attack SA should win easily .
Atapattu lacks confidance as a Captain and as a batsman.
He is loaded with Crappy Luck which seems to rub onto SL Team and the sooner he moves over the better for SL Cricket ,IMO.