Cilic played nishi in the final not a big 4. It was two new guys in the final. I think it's fair to say the gap between 5 to 10 and 1 to 4 is much smallerthe cilic win was one of the few exceptions we have had in the big 4 era, you know that as well as i do...you really cannot use that as an example to make your case here...in 2009, lightning struck rafa at the french in the shape of soderling, did that make the french open "open" that year or the next?
Yeah matches up well against him.Monfils R4 is going to be a tough one for Fed. Has lost his last two against him too.
i wouldn't be surprised at anything rafa does at roland garros (or for that matter what federer does at wimbledon, but i don't expect him to win there)...however i don't expect him to beat novak, i also wouldn't be surprised if he lost before the quarters this year...Cilic played nishi in the final not a big 4. It was two new guys in the final. I think it's fair to say the gap between 5 to 10 and 1 to 4 is much smaller
Hell rafa isn't even in that 4 on rankings anymore.
2009 doesn't work because rafa missed Wimbledon that year though. He was obviously still head and shoulders above the pack. Also soder made another French final didn't he?
Basically my question still stands. Will you be that surprised if rafa beats Novak in the quarters?