• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Super Series

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
What a stupid idea this replay for LBWs thing is. What does that replay tell us except "it might not have been out"?
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
FaaipDeOiad said:
What a stupid idea this replay for LBWs thing is. What does that replay tell us except "it might not have been out"?
simply a waste of tme hopefully it isn't seen used after this series...
 

James90

Cricketer Of The Year
I think that the LBW referrals can be useful for judging whether the ball pitched outside leg and whether it hit the batsman in line. The umpires should make the decision of height and whether the ball would go on to his the stumps.
 

Knopfler

School Boy/Girl Captain
FaaipDeOiad said:
What a stupid idea this replay for LBWs thing is. What does that replay tell us except "it might not have been out"?
It could tell us that is is out, within a reasonable doubt. Could show whether there was a nick, where it pitched or where it hit. I also think it doesn't take up much time at all, but you could give the third umpire a short time limit to make the decision.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Demolition Man said:
Yes but you don't sub on mcgrath for his batting.

Using a specialist as a sub is useless, unless you can rig the toss.
Err, no...

You pick say Hussey as a sub, and four or five bowling options in the main team.

If you win the toss, you bowl. After the 10 overs is done from a specialist bowler, bring on Hussey. If you lose the toss and you get sent in, you just bat with the team you have unless you suffer a collapse, in which case you sub off someone like Bracken for Hussey, and rely on part timers like Clarke and Symonds to bowl a few more overs for you.
 

Demolition Man

State Vice-Captain
FaaipDeOiad said:
Err, no...

You pick say Hussey as a sub, and four or five bowling options in the main team.

If you win the toss, you bowl. After the 10 overs is done from a specialist bowler, bring on Hussey. If you lose the toss and you get sent in, you just bat with the team you have unless you suffer a collapse, in which case you sub off someone like Bracken for Hussey, and rely on part timers like Clarke and Symonds to bowl a few more overs for you.
Yeah , ok but without an opening bowler the team would be under serious pressure in the field and had they collapsed as you said, well It would not look good for them. If you dont have a collpase Hussey is not used.
 

Demolition Man

State Vice-Captain
IMHO I think the super-sub idea puts more empahsis on luck. The toss is all the luck that cricket needs, we don't need a super-sub system.
 

Craig

World Traveller
Was watching it but I kept falling asleep during the first 20 or so overs.

Must be Dead Rubber Syndrome.
 

Craig

World Traveller
What Flintoff has done to himself now?

4.2 overs he has bowled, so I assume he has injured himself.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Really impressed with Watson here. We knew Hussey could do this, but this might well be the best innings of Watson's ODI career here, especially if he can last the 50.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Check these out for similar stats!!!!

Murali and Vettori in this 3 match series.....

DL Vettori 3 30 1 121 5 4-33 24.20 4.03 36.0 1 0
M Muralitharan 3 30 1 122 5 2-38 24.40 4.06 36.0 0 0
 

Top