2 and a 6 I am guessing.dinu23 said:thanks for the updates Donny. how many boundries did pollock score in the last over?
Last i heard on the Radio, he scored one Four, and was caught by Hussey, however his foot touched the boundry rope so it was declared a Six. 1x 4 1x 6dinu23 said:thanks for the updates Donny. how many boundries did pollock score in the last over?
ok Scaley whatever you just told me ,you sold me ,i am freddie no 1 man now hahaha,i cant seem to find the scores each has made and bowled in say last 18 month so i cant really win my point without the figures to back me up,but i will keep looking,if kalis is better figures i will be on quicker than a flash,if Freddie is better then you wont hear another word about it LOLScaly piscine said:If Flintoff couldn't bowl that would mean England would have to bring in someone like Tremlett to keep the 5 bowler attack, so that would cost England around 50 runs an innings on average (assume the replaced batsman averages 35-40 as opposed to Tremlett 10-15, the 50 difference is because the partnerships being bigger with a batsmen who hangs around as opposed to a tail-ender who gets out quickly) and this is without taking into account Flintoff's fielding and the fact his bowling would be better than Tremlett or whoever came in. Kallis' bowling is bordering on the part time against the better countries, if Kallis couldn't bowl it wouldn't make much difference to SA bowling attack really. Kallis' extra batting quality does not even come close to the value of Flintoff's bowling. Therefore Flintoff is more valuable to a team than Kallis, he is therefore a better all-rounder.
World XI: 8-281 (50 overs)Donny said:7/255 with 12 balls left.