Personally I think this is an extremely arrogant decision from Inzy. A great player who has been in great form, but regardless of his disappointment at not being selected, his lack of respect for the decision of the selection panel (all of whom were better cricketers than Inzy in their day, and whose opinions should be respected) strikes me of being a case of throwing his toys out of the pram big style.venomous said:Inzamam snubs Super Series
PTI
September 26, 2005
Inzamam: "I deserve respect and nothing else" © Getty Images
Inzamam-ul-Haq has refused to represent the World XI in next month's Super Test against Australia, after an apparent mix-up in communication with the Pakistan board.
"The Pakistan Cricket Board had given me an understanding that I would be in both the World XIs (ODI and Test)," Pakistan's captain, Inzamam, told the news agency PTI on Monday from Lahore, "but till today, they have not conveyed to me about my selection. I have already read my selection in the newspapers."
The Pakistan board announced that Inzamam would be in both teams on Wednesday, but two days later the ICC said that he would feature in the six-day Super Test squad only, and as a replacement for Sachin Tendulkar at that. He was omitted from the one-dayers, with the ICC instead naming Chris Gayle and Rahul Dravid as replacements for Sachin Tendulkar and Herschelle Gibbs.
"At this stage of my career, I deserve respect and nothing else," said Inzamam. "I am not pleased at all with whatever has happened. Having played cricket with respect and distinction, I don't deserve this at the fag end of my career."
He added that if he was not representing the World XI in the Test match, there was question of him participating in the Captains Conference and 2nd ICC Annual Awards. "I will not go to Australia for just one match. I have not conveyed my decision to the cricket board and there is no need for this because they have not yet communicated to me about my selection."
I should think Vaughan will be relieved to play without the burden of captaincy (which is why I'm backing him to score runs - we know how he likes big hundreds against the Aussies), but Smith will probably be in his ear every five seconds. Well he will if he's got any sense, at least.twctopcat said:Haha, fair play inzi you dapper. So that means Vaughan is in. Will he still be second fiddle to Smith?? Will be interesting seeing how much he chats with Smith - sort of along the lines of "Trust me - that's how you bowl to him....".
Well that's highly debateable.Barney Rubble said:Personally I think this is an extremely arrogant decision from Inzy. A great player who has been in great form, but regardless of his disappointment at not being selected, his lack of respect for the decision of the selection panel (all of whom were better cricketers than Inzy in their day, and whose opinions should be respected) strikes me of being a case of throwing his toys out of the pram big style.
Perhaps we shouldn't pre-empt this one. If it wasn't for the fact that he'll be there for the captains meeting I wouldn't be the least surprised to see Vaughan refuse a place.Barney Rubble said:Michael Vaughan's just captained his team to a series victory against the best team in the world - you don't see him coming out and complaining about not being selected in the first place, and then refusing to be a replacement because of it. Inzy should show some humility and accept the honour of representing the Rest of the World, instead of telling anyone who'll listen how much better he is than everybody else and how much respect he deserves.
Sunil Gavaskar , India (chairman)greg said:Well that's highly debateable.
He's better than Atherton, easily.Barney Rubble said:Sunil Gavaskar , India (chairman)
Michael Atherton, England
Sir Richard Hadlee, New Zealand
Clive Lloyd, West Indies
Jonty Rhodes , South Africa
Aravinda de Silva , Sri Lanka
I didn't realise Rhodes was on it - otherwise, there's very little debate.
Really? I think you could comfortably make a case for him being at least the equal of Atherton, de Silva and maybe Lloyd.Barney Rubble said:Sunil Gavaskar , India (chairman)
Michael Atherton, England
Sir Richard Hadlee, New Zealand
Clive Lloyd, West Indies
Jonty Rhodes , South Africa
Aravinda de Silva , Sri Lanka
I didn't realise Rhodes was on it - otherwise, there's very little debate.
All a matter of opinion I guess.greg said:Really? I think you could comfortably make a case for him being at least the equal of Atherton, de Silva and maybe Lloyd.
More like a reclusive crackpot who loads both barrels when he sees some kid climbing over the fence to get their ball back.twctopcat said:I can see Inzy becoming one of those very wise old cricketers, who sit at grounds watching saying very little, yet whatever he does say is gold.
You say it like it's a bad thing!Scaly piscine said:More like a reclusive crackpot who loads both barrels when he sees some kid climbing over the fence to get their ball back.
Works for me!Scaly piscine said:More like a reclusive crackpot who loads both barrels when he sees some kid climbing over the fence to get their ball back.
Inzy's decision is not lame nor immature, its a very wise decision. He did what was needed to be done. A player who has performed consistently well in both forms of the game, than so called biggies like Sachin, Gibbs, Kallis etc etc & etc for last 2-3 years, is negelected through out the course of selection...and then gets a replacement in the end, for an injured players who has been injured for last 2 years!...that's just simply pathetic, just pathetic!....but well, it wld have been a waste of time for him, so he shldn't care much. Better to stay home and get prepared for the upcoming tough series, instead of filling up ICC & selectors deep pockets by playing in a futile series.Scaly piscine said:Good riddance to the fat bloater, I'm not sure whether the potato is pathetically trying to get back at the Pakistan Cricket Board, the ICC selection committee or both, but the most important thing is he's shown by this lame and immature toy throwing exercise that he didn't warrant selection anyway. If he was trying to get at the ICC selection comittee he would have been better served playing and scoring a load of runs.
Current form was also one of the main criteria, but well, VB series(2004-05) was the last series which he played in Australia. He played 8 ODI's, hit 5 50s & and had a healthy average of 52.jlo33692 said:Does anyone know of hand what Inzi's record against australia,in australia,is like as this was one of the main criteria to selecting the team,or what the selectors said would be the main criteria,so where does that leave freddy and harmo?
sad day today as don adams died (get smart) funniest show ever on TV for last 30 years.Dont know what don has to do with cricket though hehehhe!!!!!!!!!!!