What fight did they show in the first innings?? Outside Thilan they all fell apart when put under some pressure from the Martin and co. I know their capable of scoring 400 plus and setting NZ some total but they never really shown the mental abilty to fight it out on seaming pitches in the past, unless someone gets a big hundred.psxpro said:I hope the weather clears, becasue we still need a lot of time to bowl srilanka out imo.
They won't go down without a fight. And there isn't the same movement as in the first morning now. Wiseman may have to take a few wickets.
Tim said:Lou Vincent doesn't look that bad either..I know that he does bowl alot for his club & that the word around is that he's rated quite highly as a medium pacer by people within NZ cricket.
It depends on what batsmen turn up, if the ones that played in the first innings then it could be over by Tea, if the batsmen that turn up are the ones that back their abilties then it could last to the last day and NZ will probably either chase a small total and if the pitch is breaking up then SL have a chance., a small one but a chance.psxpro said:Martin did bowl pretty well in the 1st innings, Srilanka didn't bat too well but Chances are Martin won't get anywhere near the same assistance from the pitch in the 2nd innings (although he did take apart sa on a flat pitch).
Apart from Martin the srilankans looked comfortable vs other bowlers.
If there is 2 full days and srilanka save it, then it would be an extrodinary achievemnt, so Nz are hot favs to win now but I'm saying I just hope the weather is fine becasue we wills till need a bit of time to bowl you guys out.
I think we have to bat out too many overs to get a draw, unless it rains off course. Teams have won from here from worse position, i can't think of any of the top of my head, but if Vincent can score a double hundred then why can't a Sri Lankan. There still around 180 overs left, a lot can happen in that time.psxpro said:I don't think even we can lose it from here. Well anything is possible but realistically we wont lose no matter what.
Draw is still a posibilty without rain if attapattu and a few other bat for a while or it rains.
If we got Attappatu early tommorow, I'd be very confident of wrapping the innings up quickly.
See how it is possible, add Atapattu abilty to get 200s, and the chances are getting bigger. It would be very funny if it did happen but, and to see who would be the scapegoats for such a loss. My guess Cumming, Mills and Wiseman would be th first ones on the list.psxpro said:Its possible, but i just can't see it happening in this test.
If anyone does it though it could be sangakarra, he is due a big score.
For srilanka to win they would probably have to score 450 minimum to leave nz 150 to win.
On this pitch which isnt that flat and srilanka looking to settle things down early tommorow it would be very hard to score that as over 4 runs an over.
Plus, to bowl out nz again malinga would have bowl like he did in napier along with vaas's excellent performance in this match.
I probably wouldn't drop Astle, but can someone tell me why he's such a sacred cow to a lot of people? How does 1 Man of the Match award in 70 tests make anyone untouchable, especially if NZ want to aspire to greater things?Isolator said:There is no way Astle can (or should) be dropped.
I can't think of an international team that has ever willingly omitted a double centurion for the next test it played. Rodney Redmond's axing is still an occasional talking point, 32 years on.Tim said:But how many International teams select like that?
Don't think anyone said that, all that was said is that they're not tailenders.chaminda_00 said:Just they can hold the bat and make some decent runs doesn't make them batsmen.
What you mean when the first 8 are all dismissed to clear catches but the last wicket is a dubious LBW, so it'll be the umpire's costing SL the game again?Voltman said:So you can bring it up at the end of tomorrow's play.
Well, I do like him a lot, so perhaps my judgment is biased, but I think he's a very good player, and with this last century there's a possibility of him embarking on a good run of form. Also, given the time the selectors gave (and wasted on) McMillan, I don't think Astle's spot is in danger. Actually, I'm quite happy with the makeup of NZ's batting at the moment, and I can't say I'd be displeased if Styris has to wait awhile, even though I quite like him.Kippax said:I probably wouldn't drop Astle, but can someone tell me why he's such a sacred cow to a lot of people? How does 1 Man of the Match award in 70 tests make anyone untouchable, especially if NZ want to aspire to greater things?
His high 30's average is very good by NZ standards historically, but batting has clearly been taken up a notch the world over. It's not like the "but Astle's based on terrible, green NZ pitches" argument holds up - he averages 7.5 runs less away than he does at home.
psxpro said:And Did you apologise to everyone about the cheating umpiring help srilanka got to win the 1996 cricket world cup? because it was in asia everyone favoured srilanka, They only won becasue the unpires cheated.
Actually, anyone can call themselves a batsman.chaminda_00 said:Just they can hold the bat and make some decent runs doesn't make them batsmen.
Australia dropped Katich after he had scored 220 runs for once out AND took five wickets in an innings.Kippax said:I can't think of an international team that has ever willingly omitted a double centurion for the next test it played. Rodney Redmond's axing is still an occasional talking point, 32 years on.