Because all the weekend options clashed with Super 12 rugby. These Tests were supposed to have been played in January, remember, so it was a case of having to reschedule them around other fixtures that were already in place.Sir Redman said:Why oh why does this test have to be Monday - Friday?
Bracewell says a lot of useless crap and has no idea when it comes to top players and picking sides. The day he gets sacked as coach should be a day of celebration in New Zealand.shaka said:Bracewell says Mcmillan is in his future plans
I think Astle owes Buchnor a few drinks tonight, For his extended stay at the wicket, having been plumb back foot in front of stumps off the very first ball, only a blind Buchnor would give it in Astle's favour !!Blaze said:I guess they are just trying to set a base.. they will play more attackingly tomorrow I guess.
Sri Lanka could be in big trouble if Astle gets going with Vincent and McCullum still to come and Marshall still in.
NZ will be aiming for 550 I would say but quick wickets from Sri Lanka could see that target change to around 400
Chandana is a very handy batsman too and so is Vaas.marc71178 said:Got to counter-balance it with a weak looking batting line up from 7 downwards though!
That's why he is used usually in short spells of 4-5 overs at a time only.Tim said:Malinga intrigues me. He looks as though that if he consistently bowled 5 or 6 overs on target he could be extremely dangerous..but from what I hear, consistency is a big problem for him.
Watch it - you're sounding a lot like a Kiwi during the NZ-Aus series.JASON said:Chandana is a very handy batsman too and so is Vaas.
Compared with their current opposition, batting is hardly weakened by the extra bowler .
However we shall see tomorrow. It also depends on whether Hair/Buchnor start giving all the close decisions one way !!
I was about to say the same thing, u create ur own luck and our fielding was shocking today. You can't afford to mess chance like we did today if be want to be one of the top Test Playing nations.Voltman said:Watch it - you're sounding a lot like a Kiwi during the NZ-Aus series.
Now you know what they mean when some one uses the expression - " swings and roundabouts" !!Voltman said:Watch it - you're sounding a lot like a Kiwi during the NZ-Aus series.
It can hardly be "plumb" when he hit it! Astle got quite a thick inside-edge on that one, so Buchnor made absolutely the correct decision NOT to give him out.JASON said:I think Astle owes Buchnor a few drinks tonight, For his extended stay at the wicket, having been plumb back foot in front of stumps off the very first ball
Hang on - unless we're playing Bradman's proposed LBW rule that inside edges shouldn't matter, snicko clearly showed Astle hit the cover of his first ball!JASON said:I think Astle owes Buchnor a few drinks tonight, For his extended stay at the wicket, having been plumb back foot in front of stumps off the very first ball, only a blind Buchnor would give it in Astle's favour !!
The replay I saw and the initial response was pretty obviously no inside edge . But I guess if snicko said inside edge one must go with it ! Although it begs the question ? Can snicko be adjusted or altered to manufacture a graph ? And who controls the snicko ? (Now I am starting to sound like sour grapes , I know !! )Cam7 said:It can hardly be "plumb" when he hit it! Astle got quite a thick inside-edge on that one, so Buchnor made absolutely the correct decision NOT to give him out.
Quite cleary there was a defelction too, along with the noise.JASON said:The replay I saw and the initial response was pretty obviously no inside edge . But I guess if snicko said inside edge one must go with it ! Although it begs the question ? Can snicko be adjusted or altered to manufacture a graph ? And who controls the snicko ? (Now I am starting to sound like sour grapes , I know !! )
Looking at the highlights tonight, I cannot fathom what in God's name Jason was on about with that first ball to Astle. Even in real time it was OBVIOUS it took an inside edge, and besides, it struck him on leg, if not slightly outside.meatspx said:Quite cleary there was a defelction too, along with the noise.
You're only allowed to moan about decisions when they are the wrong ones!
Snicko could be altered by the TV production crew - though it would be difficult to time it with the TV footage.
What is the possibility that the TV crew AND the third umpire were in the payroll of aliensmeatspx said:Quite cleary there was a defelction too, along with the noise.
You're only allowed to moan about decisions when they are the wrong ones!
Snicko could be altered by the TV production crew - though it would be difficult to time it with the TV footage.
Well when i sure it live i thought it was out and threw my Jim Beam can at the TV (it was empty), it looked OBIVOUS that it was out when i first looked at it and looked out until the sniko should a inside edage. It funny how things look different depending on who watching it.Voltman said:Looking at the highlights tonight, I cannot fathom what in God's name Jason was on about with that first ball to Astle. Even in real time it was OBVIOUS it took an inside edge, and besides, it struck him on leg, if not slightly outside.