That would explain why England weren't penalised for bowling their 20 too slowly. Duno about SL though.TT Boy said:Did you take Joyce’s 15 minute plus injury into account?
Yes, England had 16 minutes for that, and the timings were put back, so SL had to be bowling the 20th by 10.16pm - it started about half past...TT Boy said:Did you take Joyce’s 15 minute plus injury into account?
Murali wasn'tLostman said:no SL bowler bowled a no-ball in almost 20 overs
even more amazing considering that maharoof and fernando were both playing
No, England weren't penalised because they bowled SL all out - hence that rule doesn't then count (hence I said the silly last ball run out could (and most definitely should) have come back to haunt them)wpdavid said:That would explain why England weren't penalised for bowling their 20 too slowly. Duno about SL though.
OK, I hadn't realised that. Seems a strange rule if they took the final wicket(s) after their allocated time though. Still, now I understand your comment abour Fernando.marc71178 said:No, England weren't penalised because they bowled SL all out - hence that rule doesn't then count (hence I said the silly last ball run out could (and most definitely should) have come back to haunt them)
Apparently he's gonna be okayAnna said:I hope Ed Joyce is ok, sounded nasty
Indeed. Surely we need someone better than Dalrymple in the top 6 - preferably someone who can actually score reasonably quickly against the spinners. Cue Vikram?Barney Rubble said:If Joyce is missing some or all of the ODIs, this has to be the return of Rikki, surely?! Potential England side for the 1st ODI:
Trescothick
Bell
Strauss
Pietersen
Collingwood
Dalrymple
G Jones+
Bresnan
Plunkett
Harmison
Mahmood
Bloody hell.
It was a 20 over game, so being dismiised in 20 overs isn't that big an issue I'd say.Lostman said:i was hoping that Sl would be able to play 5 bowlers with bandara as the 5th bowler, but seeing as they manged to get all out in 20 overs i think 7 batsmen would be the best path. tough luck for bandara
You're probably right about Solanki. Not sure about Clarke though. He's rarely been a great oneday player for Surrey and it's not as if he's done a lot this year apart from filling his boots against the might of Leicestershire. His bowling seems more wayward than ever, tbh.marc71178 said:On Solanki, been there, tried that and not done enough though has he really?
Rikki must be ahead of him in the order.