Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
That's gotta be one of the worst posts ever.a massive zebra said:And they may well have been taken off Lewis as his slower pace gives the fielders more time to react.
That's gotta be one of the worst posts ever.a massive zebra said:And they may well have been taken off Lewis as his slower pace gives the fielders more time to react.
It may appear so at first glance but when you actually stop and think about it, my post is not that stupid. When you have an opportunity to take a catch, would you be more confident in catching the ball if it was coming at 45 mph or 100 mph? I know what I would chose and obviously the ball is more likely to come off the bat quickly when it has been delivered by a fast man. If Richard compiles first chance averages for bowlers then I would put money on the fact that spinners are less affected by dropped catches than the faster men.Jono said:That's gotta be one of the worst posts ever.
All I know is that Hayden doesn't stand at slip to seamers but does to Warne. Assumably he finds it easier catching the slower ball.a massive zebra said:It may appear so at first glance but when you actually stop and think about it, it is not that stupid. When you have an opportunity to take a catch, would you be more confident in catching the ball if it was coming at 45 mph or 100 mph? I know what I would chose and obviously the ball is more likely to come off the bat quickly when it has been delivered by a fast man. If Richard compiles first chance averages for bowlers then I would put money on the fact that spinners are less affected by this than the faster men.
OTOH a slip fielder will have less reaction time to the spinners due to standing so much closer. Hayden must be something of an anomaly, no? I can't think of any others.GeraintIsMyHero said:All I know is that Hayden doesn't stand at slip to seamers but does to Warne. Assumably he finds it easier catching the slower ball.
He goes on sabbatical for periods of time. He'll be back, don't you worry.GeraintIsMyHero said:All I know is that Hayden doesn't stand at slip to seamers but does to Warne. Assumably he finds it easier catching the slower ball.
And speaking of Richard, I haven't seen him in ages, is it just me, or what, where is he?
Lord's a couple of weeks ago?PY said:When was the last time England played five batsmen with averages over forty?
Can't have been for quite some time.
PY said:OK, in terms of eras then smarty-pants.
Pre-2003?
TMS are talking about how Murali is struggling to bowl to Pietersen, it surely can only be the fact that KP plays everything to legside so he's always playing with the spin whereas Warney obviously spins the other way and KP struggled sometimes when he went aerial last year.
Well Pietersen also dominated Warne didn't he? He averaged over 50 in that series and Warne didn't get him out too much.PY said:OK, in terms of eras then smarty-pants.
Pre-2003?
TMS are talking about how Murali is struggling to bowl to Pietersen, it surely can only be the fact that KP plays everything to legside so he's always playing with the spin whereas Warney obviously spins the other way and KP struggled sometimes when he went aerial last year.
Hobbs, Sutcliffe, Hammond?silentstriker said:How many times have England played with three batsman averaging 50+? India has Tendulkar, Sehwag, Dravid. This is a serious question, I'm trying to find that out for all sides.
That's tougher. Maybe at Lord's in 1972. Boycott, Greig & D'Oliviera all averaged over 40 at that point, I reckon. Edrich and/or Luckhurst may well have done at that stage too.PY said:OK, in terms of eras then smarty-pants.
Pre-2003?