PY
International Coach
I'm pretty certain I have that honourable distinction as I don't think I've missed a FC game yet this season.Adamc said:It's PY, I think.
Not the most runs though.
I'm pretty certain I have that honourable distinction as I don't think I've missed a FC game yet this season.Adamc said:It's PY, I think.
The relevance it has is that you're suggesting that rookies should never outperform established players, when in reality they obviously do some of the time. And yes, Tait was a rookie when he led the wicket taking in the ING Cup in 2003/04, and in his second season when he broke the Pura Cup record and led both competitions in 2004/05. McGrath was indeed a rookie when he impressed so much in the Sheffield Shield that he was called up to the test side after 8 games. The Warne example was simply to show that the best test players are not always dominant in first class cricket, which is indeed what we are discussing here as rookies are never picked for the international side. Warne played half the season last year for Victoria and averaged 36 with the ball, and in terms of spinners was totally outplayed by Stuart MacGill and Dan Cullen, the latter of whom was indeed a rookie.marc71178 said:What relevance does that have to my point?
Especially as this isn't just one isolated player, and all of those mentioned aren't rookies.
As for the Warne not being dominant - when did he last play a domestic game, let alone a season?
But did he enter the season as a better player than the current Australian side?Loony BoB said:On a random note, Matthew Hayden was the top runscorer in his maiden FC season in a highly established domestic competition. We're not even that highly established, we're still a young nation and it's understandable that rookies are going to do well in just the ninth domestic season.
In fact, I'd go as far as to say it's highly realistic.
No, that's not what I'm suggesting.FaaipDeOiad said:The relevance it has is that you're suggesting that rookies should never outperform established players
Like this?steds said:Guys, guys. Can we stop arguing amongst ourselves and start lynching Liam for not posting today's games?
There are some more constructive views hereNZTailender said:In all seriousness and respect (and sincerity), can I please hear your views on how rookies should be brought into the Dev league, Marc? I would've missed it last time round.
Cheers
Correct.Adamc said:Looks like Mr. Garven holds that distinction then. 103 FC matches without a Test (unless I'm wrong again).
Welcome back. You'll play for Cricket Web Green this season, however, unless Black trades for you.Wally West said:I'd like to rejoin the cweb dev league if its possible. It was good at the black camp last season.
That's not true. A rookie could be much more talented than the likes of Trescothick, and that talent can be manifested in a debut season.marc71178 said:No, that's not what I'm suggesting.
What I'm highlighting is that rookies should not be rated higher than current Test players, because IRL no rookie starting out in County Cricket next year would be a better batsman than for example Trescothick.
Whenever the teams are submitted.Robertinho said:No time for the write up? When will the Green vs Red game be simmed?
I thought if teams weren't submitted on time then the teams from the previous game would be used?Mr Mxyzptlk said:Whenever the teams are submitted.