I think we'll regret playing two spinners, if you play Wagner then you've got threatening spells for the first twenty overs with the three main pace bowlers and one of the all rounders, then you've got overs between the fiftieth and seventieth where we've generally managed to get the ball to reverse.I think Sarfraz will be a real thorn for NZ. Can see him coming in with Pakistan 200/5 after our bowlers have done a good job, and then getting them above 350 with ease.
by the fact that Wagner and Bracewell did all their bowling in the second innings of the warmup.Where has it been confirmed we are playing two spinners?
Kippax posted this earlier:Where has it been confirmed we are playing two spinners?
New Zealand will likely take two spinners into the Test.
Leg-spinner Ish Sodhi would be boosted by a five-wicket bag in Pakistan A's first innings, Anderson said.
They obviously don't think Neesham will play all the Tests. No refunds on series markets if someone doesn't play, unlike the innings/match markets.Rudds at 6.50, Anderson at 11 then Neesham at 17? Wat.
Holder is a much better batsman than any of the Pakistan bowlers.The oppo number eight is the most dangerous player in a series involving NZ though. Even now we have an attack Jason ****ing Holder still scored a test 50 at admittedly number seven.