grecian said:Yet I'm not one that feels we should go in with 4 bowlers in Tests, I feel overbowling my avatar has helped to cause his injuries. So if we have to drop one of the batsmen, I go for Colly, but he'll be bloody unlucky, I have to say.
Lets face it Simon Jones is our Shane Bond, theres no point talikng about him being fit, as 90% of the time he won't be. We should use Fred in the type of short fast reverse-swinging spells that hes capable of, 4 or 5 overs bursts at most. Yes he can bowl for long, tight, accurate spells tying down batsmen, but I feel thats denting his wicket-taking abilities.
We should be looking at Anderson, Hoggard, Harmison and Panesar with flintoff to bowl us to victory in the future, who cares about tail-end batting. We've finally got a batting-order where they all average over forty, it should be enough, with Fred and Read to follow the top 5.
By most accounts Anderson is a worse crock than Jones. And that's the point. The five bowlers case rests on Jones or Anderson being fit. If Mahmood or Plunkett is one then Flintoff probably will probably be "overbowled" anyway (especially if Giles plays to shore up the lengthy tail). Flintoff is overbowled because he is the only bowler we have who (at test level) can do a job in all situations, on most pitches - be the most likely wicket-taker and keep control when the batsmen are on top. And to reduce his load we need other bowlers who can do those things. Picking 10 bowlers wouldn't make a difference if Flintoff is still always first choice in ALL crucial match situations, however tired he may be.