Magrat Garlick
Global Moderator
Oh dear. Right silly shot by Taufeeq by the sounds of it.
In all fariness to him he averages 47 in last 5 tests and has taken 18 catches in 13 test. I don't reckon that drop will have any bearing on his selection considering the catches he does take, although he is probably the most likely batsman to go.grecian said:Well done, Colly, best fielder in the world apparently, still nice of him to help with the selectorial decision of who to drop when freddy comes back
Straight forward catch to third-man next over, why do swe never have a fielder there?
Agreed hes played well, but if he fields at slip, then dropping him strengthens two factors of our game, as freddys a better slipper.Gloucefan said:In all fariness to him he averages 47 in last 5 tests and has taken 18 catches in 13 test. I don't reckon that drop will have any bearing on his selection considering the catches he does take, although he is probably the most likely batsman to go.
you dont have to drop Bell, both him & KP can & should play.tooextracool said:if bell goes on to make another century tomorrow, how do you drop someone whos scored 3 centuries in 3 games and only been dismissed by andrew strauss thus far this series?
Pitch looks ideal for batting at the moment and Yousaf does look in an imperious big ton mood. If they can effectively bat out tomorrow and get anywhere near are total, than this game is as good as drawn IMO.Fusion said:Good recovery today by Yousaf and Yunis. Need to build on this tomorrow obviously. There's really only these two plus Inzi that can save the match for Pak. Fortunately, both look comfortable out there.
So who misses out then?aussie said:you dont have to drop Bell, both him & KP can & should play.
Regardless of that, he can hold a bat so is ahead of Plunkett if we play 4 seamers and Jones and Anderson are injured.Scaly piscine said:Shame Hoggard had to bowl pap with his dodgy knee. Anyway my reservations with Mahmood remain - he was picked for England 2 years ago (albeit in ODIs) and it's hard to imagine he was any more inaccurate than he is now, so where's the improvement?
PY said:As long as GBH doesn't try that horrible horrible reverse sweep thing.
That's not far from the ugliest thing in cricket.