Not from the batsmen.benchmark00 said:.....hmmm any thought people??
Touche.... Any chance of the NZ batsmen using the bat in the 2nd match? im not saying this ones all over, Vettori will be licking his lipsBlackCap_Fan said:Not from the batsmen.
wishful thinking IMO - Kasper was better than Dizzy in the 1st innings - but neither he nor Pidgeon got much of a chance once the Dizzy & Warne show got under way...............andyc said:wouldnt be surprised if lee replaces kasper in the next match. 118/2 off 35 overs arent the best figures, after all.
Mr Casson said:NZ aren't at full strength at the moment are they?
Whether they are or aren't, they're an absolute disgrace to cricket if they can't take this game to the fifth day from here.
And Fleming should have been out to the first ball of the day. Lets not leave anything out.anzac said:Vettori gone - again my feeling is that he was slightly unlucky re stride & turn - 2 50/50 decisions gone with AUS????
but all over red rover................
I knew someone would bring this up. Don't forget that Gillespie only took 3 wickets for the game - are you going to replace him too?andyc said:wouldnt be surprised if lee replaces kasper in the next match. 118/2 off 35 overs arent the best figures, after all.
Dydl said:New Zealand had Australia on the ropes only to let Warne get a 5-fer and lose the match.
But they managed to . It was really dissapointing effort, i was away for the first two days and come back to see NZ back to normal and throwing away the chances that they had after making 433.benchmark00 said:There it is... 9 wicket win.
New Zealand will be bitterly dissapointed with the 2nd innings effort, didnt deserve to lose like that.
Blaze said:At what time did NZ have AUS on the ropes?