Daemon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Watling would be the last thing on their mind when facing NZ. They'd probably be thinking of vettori, taylor etc.They have Shakib al Hasan. Bangladesh thought "lol, Watling sux against spin."
Watling would be the last thing on their mind when facing NZ. They'd probably be thinking of vettori, taylor etc.They have Shakib al Hasan. Bangladesh thought "lol, Watling sux against spin."
Hmm, he's generally a slow starter each time he steps up a level or moves into a new format. Could be a tough series for him.Williamson to ton up!
WAC!If you go through with that, an Indian loss will be in humanity's best interest.
I believe he is gonna say that anyway.. So might as well keep the anti jinxing going.Let me put it this way: Zinzan will enjoy himself saying India isn't a clear cut no.1 or whatever if you keep being such wussy miserable ****s about your team.
Oh, Shri has balls, all right. They're right up there on his chest.At least one of you has balls. But this guy being the one with balls is as suprising as Nathan Bracken's true gender.
Oh, Shri has balls, all right. They're right up there on his chest.
I just hope NZ don't beat us by innings' margins. That'd be very embarrassing.
You deserved that, you overconfident, arrogant, intolerable, ****y Indian fanboy
Yeah and we at least have decent(ish) spinners to fall back on when our seamers have an off day or when the pitch is a road, can't say the same for NZ.For all the talk of India's fast bowling problems, it's not exactly like any of the NZ seamers are absolute world beaters, or that New Zealand's top order is particularly great... Shri's right... for once
AWTA. I'll be VERY surprised if it isn't 3-0 to India. NZ has two top class players, Vettori and Taylor. India has Tendulkar, Sehwag, Laxman, Khan, Harbhajan, Gambhir ...Yeah and we at least have decent(ish) spinners to fall back on when our seamers have an off day or when the pitch is a road, can't say the same for NZ.
Would put that down to the fact that India where still very poor away from home during those days. The improvement away from hom probably started after that 2003/04 to Australia.India are a peculiar bunch.. I remember after beating Australia in that epic series in 2001, they went and lost to Zimbabwe.
I presume that work thats blanked out is not "better"?.You cant' compare that Indian team to the Indian team of today.
In fact the Indian team that beat Australia in 2001 was so much ****ter than the Indian team that got belted by Australia 2-1 at home in 2004.
2001 was just filled with some amazing individual performances by Laxman, Harbhajan, Dravid and Tendulkar at crucial times in that series.
I personally think the Headingley Test in 2002 was the start of India getting better away from home.Would put that down to the fact that India where still very poor away from home during those days. The improvement away from hom probably started after that 2003/04 to Australia.