tooextracool
International Coach
simon jones seems to be bowling like he was in the WI....complete rubbish so far this innings
tooextracool said:why should jones be dropped?he has shown quite a bit of improvement since the WI tour.
tooextracool said:simon jones seems to be bowling like he was in the WI....complete rubbish so far this innings.
OK.tooextracool said:simon jones seems to be bowling like he was in the WI....complete rubbish so far this innings
No, he bowled dreadfully as usual. He only got his first two wickets because Flintoff was bowling well at the other end putting the batsman under pressure so they tryed to attack the looser bowler at the other end and played one shot too many. If Flintoff had not been bowling at the other end Jones would not have got those wickets. His third wicket was an unlucky bottom edge from a short and wide pie of a delivery.tooextracool said:i dont know if you actually watch any cricket or just look at the scoreboard.....simon jones bowled brilliantly in the first innings.
Where does McCullum normally bat?Loony BoB said:Just backing up the commentators, Richardson and McCullum are very good with their calling and running. For two people you don't expect to be in together too often, they work extremely well together.
never said jones should be out of the side, hes just bowled really badly today in contrast to his first innings performance.luckyeddie said:So that's Trescothick out, Jones, Giles and Hoggard.
since when?since rating him as the best all rounder in the world and putting him on my current world XI side?luckyeddie said:You don't like Flintoff,.
really? i think you've mistaken me for richard.luckyeddie said:Harmison.
i think strauss and collingwood are younger players close to hitting their primes.luckyeddie said:or Hussain
hes already scored more runs than chris read has on the entire tour of the WI. considering boucher and stewart both struggled last yr in england i dont see why his keeping in this test match should be questioned.luckyeddie said:Geraint Jones is nowhere near the best keeper in England so he's safe in the side.
you dont get 4 maiden overs in a row with one bowler bowling loosely at the other end. seems to me like you are making comments again on players you never watched play.a massive zebra said:No, he bowled dreadfully as usual. He only got his first two wickets because Flintoff was bowling well at the other end putting the batsman under pressure so they tryed to attack the looser bowler at the other end and played one shot too many. If Flintoff had not been bowling at the other end Jones would not have got those wickets. His third wicket was an unlucky bottom edge from a short and wide pie of a delivery.
haha. Flintoff - the best allrounder in the world.tooextracool said:since when?since rating him as the best all rounder in the world and putting him on my current world XI side?
and who would your best all rounder in the world be?murali?a massive zebra said:haha. Flintoff - the best allrounder in the world.
Your mad. Murali is about as close as Brian Lara to being the best allrounder in the world.tooextracool said:and who would your best all rounder in the world be?murali?
6-8 in NZ, McCullum at 3 in Canterbury but Richardson doesn't play for that domestic team.a massive zebra said:Where does McCullum normally bat?
precisely why you would rate him as the best allrounder in the world.a massive zebra said:Your mad. Murali is about as close as Brian Lara to being the best allrounder in the world.
Right over your head, mate. Whoosh.a massive zebra said:Your mad. Murali is about as close as Brian Lara to being the best allrounder in the world.
But I dont rate him as the best allrounder in the world. He is not even an allrounder.tooextracool said:precisely why you would rate him as the best allrounder in the world.
since most of you're arguments seem completely illogical i assumed that you would rate someone like murali as the best all rounder in the world.i still havent got an answer as to who you rate as the best all rounder in the world?a massive zebra said:But I dont rate him as the best allrounder in the world. He is not even an allrounder.
How can someone with one 50 in over 100 Test innings and a batting average similar to Darren Gough be thought of as an allrounder?
You comments are quite frankly beyond belief.
So is that one. You DO live in the UK, right? You've read the posts by people of the likes of Eddie and Richard and co, you should have learned the arts of sarcasm and rhetoric by now.a massive zebra said:But I dont rate him as the best allrounder in the world. He is not even an allrounder.
How can someone with one 50 in over 100 Test innings and a batting average similar to Darren Gough be thought of as an allrounder?
You comments are quite frankly beyond belief.