• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** NatWest Series/Challenge

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Don't really get Vaughan, now Gough will have to bowl one over when he could have simply brought Flintoff back instead of Harmison and then Gough wouldn't have had to have bowled an over.
 

shaka

International Regular
Gough hasn't bowled badly from what I can see from his bowling figures on cricinfo. Plus he has experience in bowling at the death.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
oh dear, somehow we got to get to 200 but even if Australia dont get to 200 England will still have thier work cut out to chase down whatever the aussies put on the board.
 

shaka

International Regular
Lee will be looking forward to bowling as is Gillespie (maybe) because of the extra bounce they are able to get.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
9 easy runs from the ex-Yorkshi*e plodder before he gets another freebie wicket to flatter his figures.

Argh that's twice I've been beaten to it by mere seconds.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Going to be tough for Pietersen if he does play at 4 as has been said. At least unlike at Durham England would be happy to take something like 30-0 off 15 overs.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
shaka said:
Isn't Gough still playing for Yorkshire?
He's @ Essex now.

Def no. 11's shot from McGrath there. Don't think you can attach too much blame, but he'd have been far better off just ducking!
 

Top