look at his signature, he is a devoted fan of rana, just as u seem to be one of ajit agarkar.marc71178 said:All I did was point out an inconsistency in a poster who has never yet said anything good about Pakistan.
look at his signature, he is a devoted fan of rana, just as u seem to be one of ajit agarkar.marc71178 said:All I did was point out an inconsistency in a poster who has never yet said anything good about Pakistan.
well you censor the english curses, so what do you want us to do? not utter profanities? bloody englishman. oops!marc71178 said:That isn't an issue.
We can easily find out what it means.
There's also the small point that this is an English language forum.
Yes marc is right.This wahindia guy never says nothing good about pakistan.marc71178 said:All I did was point out an inconsistency in a poster who has never yet said anything good about Pakistan.
That's the general idea.Gangster said:well you censor the english curses, so what do you want us to do? not utter profanities? bloody englishman. oops!
Yes, and they're censorred for a reason.Gangster said:well you censor the english curses, so what do you want us to do? not utter profanities? bloody englishman. oops!
tooextracool said:is it me or is rameez raja completely blind?
2 balls before the tendulkar's wicket, there was a clear inside edge, and rameez raja thought tendulkar was extremely lucky to not have been given lbw.
no he said quite clearly that there was no inside edge and that it hit pad first.Unattainableguy said:No, he mean't Tendulark's extremely lucky to get the inside-edge.
From the first angle, he said it's difficult to tell (whether there's an edge), but then from a different one, he clearly stated there was one and that Tendulkar was lucky to have got an edge.tooextracool said:no he said quite clearly that there was no inside edge and that it hit pad first.
meanwhile rana really is bowling beautifully, completely deceived sehwag with a ball that came in.
certainly not from what i heard. from what i heard he said clearly that it 'hit him pad first' and that he was extremely fortunate to still be batting out there. wasnt too much of a surprise when shastri just ignored it and changed topic either.Unattainableguy said:From the first angle, he said it's difficult to tell (whether there's an edge), but then from a different one, he clearly stated there was one and that Tendulkar was lucky to have got an edge.
because ive said that is it?Sanz said:Oh so now Yuvraj is also better than Tendulkar.