Arachnodouche
International Captain
Nope.We are going to lose this aren't we?
Nope.We are going to lose this aren't we?
You're still effectively 4/325 FFS. You'll win this easily.Odds on this ending up like a Capetown 2011 test?
LOL please, match is still India's, scoring quick on this pitch is super difficult all said and done. We just need to cross 400 and give us as much time as we can, tire them out more and rest up our bowlers.Look, this is why you don't declare on 440 in the first innings of a test match.
I wasn't gambhiring. India still 95% chance of winning this. Gives Australia a bit of hope though, however slim.You're still effectively 4/325 FFS. You'll win this easily.
Not my point. India will still win this. But we could've ground australia into the dust more.LOL please, match is still India's, scoring quick on this pitch is super difficult all said and done. We just need to cross 400 and give us as much time as we can, tire them out more and rest up our bowlers.
yeah india could literally declare here and be a 90%+ chance of winning, but this is certainly good for moraleNot my point. India will still win this. But we could've ground australia into the dust more.
No this is why you don't not enforce a follow on when you absolutely should and there is nothing to be gained by batting for 40 overs.Look, this is why you don't declare on 440 in the first innings of a test match.
this is the correct answerLook, this is why you don't declare on 440 in the first innings of a test match.
Yeah exactly. All a bit unnecessary. Weird approach too, I'd have even understood a collapse going for quick runs.yeah india could literally declare here and be a 90%+ chance of winning, but this is certainly good for morale
right, that sort of thing would have potentially precipitated a "wheels falling off" situation where the team is half-beaten before a ball is bowled in sydneyThis is good for morale if nothing else
India could have been 1-120 by lunch tomorrow otherwise