GoodAreasShane
Cricketer Of The Year
This can probably be unstickied, and whth it the dire alpha/beta stuff can be consigned to the scrapheap of forum history too
The ideal test match is different every time. That's what makes it great. I want and expect different conditions at Wanderers compared to Perth compared to Galle. Sometimes I want it to spit and spin wildly on day one. Sometimes I want the fast bowlers to have the the advantage. I never want the batsmen to have the advantage, but I suppose I can live with it from time to time as long as it's not a borefest that's automatically a draw from day one.The ideal test match has a but of juice in the deck on day one, is a great batting deck days 2 and 3 and begins to deteriorate day 4 and by the end of day 5 I'd offering a lot for the spinners.
tbf it was a pretty decent-good tour thread (relative to the other India Australia threads we've had) until after the test cricket was done.This can probably be unstickied, and whth it the dire alpha/beta stuff can be consigned to the scrapheap of forum history too
I wish this thought would die.The ideal test match has a but of juice in the deck on day one, is a great batting deck days 2 and 3 and begins to deteriorate day 4 and by the end of day 5 I'd offering a lot for the spinners.
I'm saying the team wins the toss, bowls first, bowls the other team out for 250, piles on 500 when its a road and bowls the other team out again when it starts deteriorating. In theory, the conditions could be in favour of one team on every single day. So how is this pitch "ideal"?The extra juice on day 1 should be roughly the equivalent difficulty as the extra spin and variable bounce is worth at the end of the game.
Choosing to bat when winning the toss shouldn't be a no brainer.
The gambhiring was pretty much just ***** tootbf it was a pretty decent-good tour thread (relative to the other India Australia threads we've had) until after the test cricket was done.
Negative points were excessive gambhiring, *****, alpha/beta, #sensitive, pax indica and *****.
Bowls the team out for 350 by lunch on day 2. Make 450 and declare tea on day 3, other team makes 300 all out at stumps day 4, second team are chasing 200 in three sessions.I'm saying the team wins the toss, bowls first, bowls the other team out for 250, piles on 500 when its a road and bowls the other team out again when it starts deteriorating. In theory, the conditions could be in favour of one team on every single day. So how is this pitch "ideal"?
This script plays out a lot in England and New Zealand. Except that in New Zealand, sometimes the wicket never really breaks up at all.I'm saying the team wins the toss, bowls first, bowls the other team out for 250, piles on 500 when its a road and bowls the other team out again when it starts deteriorating. In theory, the conditions could be in favour of one team on every single day. So how is this pitch "ideal"?
During the Melbourne test you said 400 wasn't going to be enough as a Mitch Marsh ton was guaranteed lolThe gambhiring was pretty much just ***** too
Haha what, that was a half joking post meant to illustrate how flat I thought the pitch was.During the Melbourne test you said 400 wasn't going to be enough as a Mitch Marsh ton was guaranteed lol