silentstriker said:You must remind me - how many non-subcontinental series victories did we achieve under Wright?
Having read through the last 10 pages or so, I agree. Though the Warne vs Murali one was quite awful.Jono said:Worst official thread I've seen in a while.
Its a disgrace.
You have no reason to praise Santh, Munaf and VRV. But its not fair to go overboard in putting all the blame at Chapel/Dravid. Why isn't Agarkar playing, for one? You take away the one bowler who has clearly been troubling the WI batsmen and then blame the team management for doing away with the one bowler who's seemed most ineffective (Pathan). I can visualize an alternative scenario in which Pathan would be in the team and get clobbered mercilessly and then everyone would be blaming Chapel/Dravid for taking pathan when he clearly wasnt in form as was obvious from the ODIs.Sanz said:Okay Jono/Dasa, I am sure you have been watching the game, Please tell us why we should praise Santh, Munaf and VRV ?
Also, Please tells us why is Irfan not playing ? The guy who was our best bowler and a potential future allrounder until few days ago is said to be having low confidence. What is he doing in WI then and why does his low confidence deserve a public announcement ?
And a bowling line-up of Santh, Munaf, Kumble, Harbhajan sounds menacing to you on non Indian pitches? I'm not saying it would not have worked out, just that that lineup would be scarier than the one they took, had the pitch offered no spin at all. At least, now they have fall back options like Yuvraj, Sehwag, Laxman.JustTool said:from cricinfo:
India's plight would have been even worse had it not been for Virender Sehwag, who got the ball to turn, bounce, and was rewarded with two wickets
And the think-tank chose to exclude Bhajji. Go figure.
Congrats Xavier.roseboy64 said:Sensationalism at it's best I say.
And that brings up number 6000.
pug said:And a bowling line-up of Santh, Munaf, Kumble, Harbhajan sounds menacing to you on non Indian pitches? I'm not saying it would not have worked out, just that that lineup would be scarier than the one they took, had the pitch offered no spin at all. At least, now they have fall back options like Yuvraj, Sehwag, Laxman.
I totally disagree.pug said:But Santh and Munaf are still good prospects.
Sanz said:I totally disagree.
silentstriker said:As the commentators are saying, Sreesanth is obviously struggling for confidence and doesn't want to bowl. He aborted his run up TWICE in the last over and you can tell from his facial expression that he is just struggling. He shouldn't be on right now. And his front foot is a full yard behind the crease. Wow, he is so out of form.