2.75 wpm is pretty awful for a full time bowler but having to bowl in the sub continent is bad for any fast bowler. He's still the worst player ever to have played 80 tests.Ishant has a been a Perfectly Fine Test Bowler since mid-2015 (India's tour of BD)
20 Tests, 47 wickets, average of 30.54 and an economy of 2.74
His worst performance in this time was in Australia, where he took just 3 wickets in 3 Tests, but even then managed an economy of 2.67
It confuses me that people haven't worked out how massively over-rated de Kock is.Never would have imagined that De Kock would have a series like this, especially against India of all teams, a team that he usually relishes playing against.
4ungidi looks really big.
Lol no. Best overseas bat we have.Rahane was NOT a clear cut case when India arrived in SA.
Shreya Iyer should be the backup choice, not Rohit.Yes, but the impact can be big on team composition. Having a useless Rohit at 5 or 6 is more dangerous than having a subpar Dhawan opening.
Must have been an illusion. I was seriously expecting that I was going to find out he is nearly 7 foot. 6'2" has me really disappointed. He must have been standing near some very short folk on the camera shots I saw and probably in the foreground too.
One good thing is now that we have the bowling to do damage on cloudy days too.They were competent against Rabada. Anderson shouldn't be a problem if they show him the respect he deserves on cloudy days.
You ever seen Anderson bowl in English conditions ? He will be a problem for the Indian batsmen, I can assure you of that, cloudy or otherwise.They were competent against Rabada. Anderson shouldn't be a problem if they show him the respect he deserves on cloudy days.