They've seen a good deal of those two. You know how certain people make up claims to prove a point on this forum .. quite common in this thread especially. Still, I do think Kaif will play a huge role as he's in rich form and has improved his batting recently. Kartik is inconsistent so I wouldn't depend on him, but Raina is a talented guy who if given an opportunity could shine and be a surprise factor for India. Same goes with Sreesanth, who could add some energy to the Indian (lack-of) pace attack if he's played ... and he definitely should be in from the first match itself.Jono said:How have Pakistan not seen much of Kaif and Murali Kartik? (not Karthik the wicket keeper damn it)
adharcric said:In matches like these between two talent-abundant teams in India & Pakistan, who both have so many game-changers ... Sehwag, Tendulkar, Dhoni, Inzamam, Afridi, Akhtar ... you can say all that you want about how the teams match up on paper, but it won't mean much. This match is tough to predict; if Sreesanth plays he could well end up becoming the new "difference-maker". That's how unpredictable it is.
yeah, kaif is best-suited for the #3 spot.Jono said:Kaif should bat no lower than 5 for the ODIs. Hopefully he bats fairly high tomorrow, because I think he's got more to offer than just a finisher. His best knocks have always been when he's had a lot of time in the middle. Dravid and Yuvraj bat much better in the latter overs than Kaif.
Jono said:Kaif should bat no lower than 5 for the ODIs. Hopefully he bats fairly high tomorrow, because I think he's got more to offer than just a finisher. His best knocks have always been when he's had a lot of time in the middle. Dravid and Yuvraj bat much better in the latter overs than Kaif.
I think the constant shuffling of Irfan Pathan, however talented a batsman he is, is not a good thing for the Indian team. Most matches each batsmen doesn't even know where he is batting!TIF said:I would like to see India go with this line-up -
Sehwag
Tendulkar
Pathan
Dravid
Kaif
Yuvraj
Raina
Dhoni(w)
Zaheer
Harbhajan
RP Singh
Super-sub: M Kartik
As for the ODIs, India, have recently improved in ODIs since Greg Chappell, took over and have done well against Sri Lanka and South Africa recently. India, nearly pulled off a win against South Africa, despite being 35/5, showing the depth in batting which was missing from the earlier Indian one-day teams.
As for Pakistan, they always seem to do well in the ODIs. I expect the ODIs to be a hard fought contest and would currently like to stay away from any predictions after my last prediction about "India can chase 500+" was a super-flop. I have decided not to predict anything for India-Pakistan matches as these matches are the toughest to predict.
It's not a bad idea, as long as he bats with a cushoin of runs behind him, and attack the bowling given every opportunity, unlike Agarkar, who was blocking many deliveries on a hundred-plus-strike-rate pitch. Any position is good for him, as long as he gets at least five overs, but he shouldn't open the batting– let that be left to the Test openers.Armadillo said:I think the constant shuffling of Irfan Pathan, however talented a batsman he is, is not a good thing for the Indian team. Most matches each batsmen doesn't even know where he is batting!
Better yet, have Raina as a super-sub for Sreesanth. Keep five bowling options intact. Oh well, they could have selected Ramesh Powar or Munaf Patel...Super-sub: M Kartik
Yes, somehow they were able to win that test match.cricket guy said:pakistan won the test match hurrah!
TIF said:I would like to see India go with this line-up -
Sehwag
Tendulkar
Pathan
Dravid
Kaif
Yuvraj
Raina
Dhoni(w)
Zaheer
Harbhajan
RP Singh
Super-sub: M Kartik
As for the ODIs, India, have recently improved in ODIs since Greg Chappell, took over and have done well against Sri Lanka and South Africa recently. India, nearly pulled off a win against South Africa, despite being 35/5, showing the depth in batting which was missing from the earlier Indian one-day teams.
As for Pakistan, they always seem to do well in the ODIs. I expect the ODIs to be a hard fought contest and would currently like to stay away from any predictions after my last prediction about "India can chase 500+" was a super-flop. I have decided not to predict anything for India-Pakistan matches as these matches are the toughest to predict.
Agreed, i'm against it as well, both Pathan and Dhoni have been made to bat at several positions.Pathan's opening of the innings was the most stupid decision taken by Greg so far, hopefully that won't be repeated.Armadillo said:I think the constant shuffling of Irfan Pathan, however talented a batsman he is, is not a good thing for the Indian team. Most matches each batsmen doesn't even know where he is batting!
Which is why Akmal is scoring good centuries opening and Afridi is being very successful coming in at the end of the innings.Arjun said:The Pakistan lineup is a good one, and may be expected, but swap Afridi with Akmal. Afridi's just a hitter, and a very explosive one, so he'll be a lot more effective at the top of the order. Akmal is more of a pure middle-order batsman, and he'd be a lot better at position six or seven rather than facing the new ball.
The question is, how long is a run be classed as bad form before it reaches the stage where it might be something far more telling?pug said:Sacrilege!
Maybe if he fails longer and looks out of sorts...