silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Why are the Indian players opening up? India can't win. Just keep batting.
Because if they collapse they actually have something to fall back on?Why are the Indian players opening up? India can't win. Just keep batting.
haha-you are joking right?that is a more paranoid comment than ones made by some pakistan fans.Because we're ****ing ********. Also if we ripped you to pieces like 2002 you might not tour again and give NZC money.
O'Brien drops the catch..who wants to comment?
Here comes a draw.
The guy has been there for 600 minutes. The chance of a collapse is much higher if they open up, rather than banking on what got them through 151 overs for loss of only three wickets.Because if they collapse they actually have something to fall back on?
Whenever the idea of greentops has been floated down here, thats been the rebuttal by the non-greentop brigade.haha-you are joking right?that is a more paranoid comment than ones made by some pakistan fans.
Gambhir didn't open up, he was bowled a bad ball and put it away. Nothing wrong with that. Laxman played the risky shot.The guy has been there for 600 minutes. The chance of a collapse is much higher if they open up, rather than banking on what got them through 151 overs for loss of only three wickets.
What makes you say that?Its not too far fetched to suggest that if we had swept the series 2 or 3-0 via 2002 greentops, there would have been frowns from the BCCI again.
There were frowns last time weren't there? I certainly remember an interview with Ganguly where he was unhappy. I was 12 or so though, so my memory may be faulty. however as my memory serves, they weren't happy and if it happened again in the current climate, there's those in NZ that believe that it would damage cricketing relations (Mark Richardson being their leader).What makes you say that?
They had even bounce iirc. sure they were dificult, very dificult, but they were the equivalent of what this pitch and many other pitches are to bowlers.2002 wickets were a bit more than green tops if truth be told.
Just a sporting wicket wouldn't piss off the BCCI. You realise SA vs. India had two of those right?
Ganguly doesn't decide the tours. You can't attribute what players say to what BCCI does. Kumble was unhappy for a decade with what Indian groundsmen did to the boundaries. Nothing happened.There were frowns last time weren't there? I certainly remember an interview with Ganguly where he was unhappy. I was 12 or so though, so my memory may be faulty. however as my memory serves, they weren't happy and if it happened again in the current climate, there's those in NZ that believe that it would damage cricketing relations (Mark Richardson being their leader).
I think the BCCI does care to an extent about how the team does tbh.Ganguly doesn't decide the tours. You can't attribute what players say to what BCCI does. Kumble was unhappy for a decade with what Indian groundsmen did to the boundaries. Nothing happened.
People who think it does are speaking out of their ass. That's not the way BCCI think. Speaking honestly, NZ could prepare Tests that last one day or ones that wouldn't have a result in a hundred years, and BCCI would still look at only one thing when deciding tours: money and/or politics. That's it. Preparing greentops or flat tops will not make a difference, BCCI doesn't particularly care how the team does.
Not when deciding tours, they don't. They'd tour Iraq in the middle of the Battle of Fallujah if there was money.I think the BCCI does care to an extent about how the team does tbh.
Well, it's the dumbest view I've ever heard. I can't believe Mark Richardson is peddling it. I'd actually be slightly happy if that view turned out to be true - it means they actually care somewhat (). Not true though.Anyway, my point is that certain sections down here, rightly or wrongly, believe that preparing nasty greentops would screw over cricketing relations between the two.
Not saying I completely agree with it (though its not out of the realms of possibility, stranger things have happened) but yes, I would mostly agree, the main example of that view was an article richardson wrote about "pleasing the boss", think its on cricinfo.Not when deciding tours, they don't. They'd tour Iraq in the middle of the Battle of Fallujah if there was money.
Well, it's the dumbest view I've ever heard.