Aren't all fast bowlers?Bail rather. Such a huge confidence bowler, and evidently psychopath
Wonder how long it'll take him to come around the wicket and try to leverage that one coming in with one holding its line, possibly more dangerous than coming over.Those byes from Boult hooped. Huge swing.
Obviously not ishant sharmaAren't all fast bowlers?
Yeah, I think you're right here, and it's a thoroughly under-discussed thing in regards to bowlers. Wagner wouldn't last a series in the Australian side, where you're swapped in-and-out of the attack for 3 or 4 over spells regularly, rather than bowling 8-10 over spells. Given he takes some time to get going, you have to make his spells as long as possible to outweigh the 2-3 overs of crap he starts with.He's the one bowler in this attack who should be bowling at least eight over spells, if not ten to twelve. If McCullum leaves him at the crease for a longer spell, you watch his threat rise.
past tense: purported; past participle: purportedChallenge is, though, not going back to bowling dross after a purported piece of genius.
Yeah, I notice that with Aussie but to be fair, you've got so many walking wounded bowlers that I don't blame Pup for rotation. As a bowler that generally needed a couple of overs to work out the length I should be bowling on a wicket and get the muscle fibres firing, I generally asked my captain to bowl me in eight to twelve over bursts and more often than not I'd bowl my full eight on the trot in forty over cricket.Yeah, I think you're right here, and it's a thoroughly under-discussed thing in regards to bowlers. Wagner wouldn't last a series in the Australian side, where you're swapped in-and-out of the attack for 3 or 4 over spells regularly, rather than bowling 8-10 over spells. Given he takes some time to get going, you have to make his spells as long as possible to outweigh the 2-3 overs of crap he starts with.
Would be interesting to look at the average length of spell from various bowlers, tbh.
No point having two bowlers doing that, IMO. Boult swinging it back in to around off stump and looking for an lbw, with the odd one holding it's line across the batsman is fine.Wonder how long it'll take him to come around the wicket and try to leverage that one coming in with one holding its line, possibly more dangerous than coming over.
And as I say that, Boult gets Rahane lbw. Can't really blame Davis for turning it down, there would have been doubt in two areas in his mind.Boult swinging it back in to around off stump and looking for an lbw, with the odd one holding it's line across the batsman is fine.
Even with 500 on the board we can't afford the dross that he bowls in between.He's the one bowler in this attack who should be bowling at least eight over spells, if not ten to twelve. If McCullum leaves him at the crease for a longer spell, you watch his threat rise.
didn't stop him from giving Corey Anderson out hit high from a bowler bowling wide around the stumps.And as I say that, Boult gets Rahane lbw. Can't really blame Davis for turning it down, there would have been doubt in two areas in his mind.