• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* India in Australia Thread

jagaways

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
india has the best batting and the best bowling attack in the world.
ROFLMAO

hehehe lol@ mr mxyzptlk...btw how xactli did u come up with that nick?

Australia still has the strongest batting line up in the world by a mile if you ask me.
this, however, is false. the indian batting lineup is IMO AT LEAST equal to if not better than the aussies.

If Waugh, Hayden, Ponting, Langer, Martyn and Gilchrist were to travel to India and decide to live there, do you, in your opinion, think that they would be able to get into the current Indian side?
the only people that would make the side would be hayden and gilchrist. hayden would replace chopra, and gilchrist would replace patel. apart from that..IMO sehwag> langer, dravid>ponting, tendulkar>martyn, and laxman>waugh. so i reiterate...i believe the indian batting lineup is at the LEAST equal to the aussies..if not better.

however..the bowling is another story...lol
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
jagaways said:
apart from that..IMO sehwag> langer, dravid>ponting, tendulkar>martyn, and laxman>waugh.
Hmmm... Langer has better temperament IMO. I would think it would be Ponting v Tendulkar, in which case I would say they are equal. Dravid is a best as good as Ponting IMO, but clearly better than Martyn. Martyn is better than Ganguly and Laxman IMO.

Basically, I would say that the Indian lineup is good, but Australia is still better.
 

iamdavid

International Debutant
Sehwag v Hayden - I'd take Hayden as would anyone (bar Amits)

Chopra v Langer - Langer

Dravid v Ponting - to close to call , I honestly couldnt seperate them , depends on conditions.

Tendulkar v Martyn - Tendulkar

Ganguly v Waugh - Waugh

Laxman v Katich - Laxman

Patel v Gilchrist - Gilchrist

AA v Lee - hhmm , interesting , again a very close one , would have to flip a coin.

Harbhajan v Warne - Warne

Gillespie v Khan - Gillespie

McGrath v Nehra - McGrath

Australia wins man for man 7-2 (2 are to close to call)
 

gibbsnsmith

State Vice-Captain
surely its better to make a comparison to how well a player has done against the opposition, so man to man Harbhajan would be up on Warne...and so on...

also, its quite pointless to do manto man on teams as it does really show much, itd be another idea to compare partnerships
such as Sehwag and Chopra V Hayden and Langer....surely no doubts, EVEN from Amit, to who the better is there
 
Last edited:

Blewy

Cricketer Of The Year
gibbsnsmith said:
also, its quite pointless to do manto man on teams as it does really show much, itd be another idea to compare partnerships
such as Sehwag and Chopra V Hayden and Langer....surely no doubts, EVEN from Amit, to who the better is there
Are we talking about the same Amits who thinks Tendulkar is the greatest player EVER???

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

krkode

State Captain
iamdavid said:
Sehwag v Hayden - I'd take Hayden as would anyone (bar Amits)

Chopra v Langer - Langer

Dravid v Ponting - to close to call , I honestly couldnt seperate them , depends on conditions.

Tendulkar v Martyn - Tendulkar

Ganguly v Waugh - Waugh

Laxman v Katich - Laxman

Patel v Gilchrist - Gilchrist

AA v Lee - hhmm , interesting , again a very close one , would have to flip a coin.

Harbhajan v Warne - Warne

Gillespie v Khan - Gillespie

McGrath v Nehra - McGrath

Australia wins man for man 7-2 (2 are to close to call)
Man to man comparisons are pointless. I think your comparison would mean more if it were:

Sehwag + Chopra + Dravid + Tendulkar + Ganguly + Laxman + Patel + AA + Harbhajan + Gillespie + Khan + Nehra

VS

Hayden + Langer + Ponting + Martyn + Katich + Waugh + Gilchrist + Lee + Warne + Gillespie + McGrath

That said, it is always difficult to judge such situations. Let's wait for match 3.
 

krkode

State Captain
Blewy said:
Are we talking about the same Amits who thinks Tendulkar is the greatest player EVER???

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
That's not a very far-fetched opinion. If he said Sehwag was the greatest player ever, I'd put the lol symbold 4 times. When it gets all the way up to Tendulkar, it's a matter of opinion. Don't throw me Bradman's 99 or Pollock's 62 and scrutinize it next to Tendulkar's snivelling 55. Times are different. So are players.
 

V Reddy

International Debutant
Blewy said:
Are we talking about the same Amits who thinks Tendulkar is the greatest player EVER???

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hmm.. i have seen some people with that opinion actually and not necessarily all are Indian. There was no technology during those days, Cricket played almost every other day which means player burnout or loss appetite , Bradman 's bat coming from third man area , improved fielding ,etc,. are the reasons cited.But one has to give it to Bradman b'coz he did what no other person did. But that was not the correct one to quote but maybe India having the best bowling attack or Kartik finishing off Aus in 10 balls are the ones
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
krkode said:
That's not a very far-fetched opinion. If he said Sehwag was the greatest player ever, I'd put the lol symbold 4 times. When it gets all the way up to Tendulkar, it's a matter of opinion. Don't throw me Bradman's 99 or Pollock's 62 and scrutinize it next to Tendulkar's snivelling 55. Times are different. So are players.
Very true.

They could be worse nowadays.
 

ReallyCrazy

Banned
Sehwag V Langer : Sehwag is sooooo much better.

Only Hayden and Gilchrist are the better than Chopra and Patel. In everything else, the Indian batting lineup is better.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
ReallyCrazy said:
Sehwag V Langer : Sehwag is sooooo much better.

Only Hayden and Gilchrist are the better than Chopra and Patel. In everything else, the Indian batting lineup is better.
Quote saved for future reference.

I like jokes.
 

biased indian

International Coach
Every one Want Warne in their team.Just look at his performance aganist india and u will know how bad a bowler he is. u have to perform aganist the best that a spinner will face not the aganist the english who doest even know how to play a spinner!!!!!.

Warne aganist india in 11 matches
Balls Runs Wickets Avg Wkt/Match Run/Over 5 W/I Best
3085 - 1608 - 29 - 55.45 - 2.64 - 3.13 - 0 - 4-47

Warne aganist England in 26 matches
Balls Runs Wickets Avg Wkt/Match Run/Over 5 W/I Best
7792 - 3040 - 132 - 23.03 - 5.08 - 2.34 - 7 - 8-71
:duh: :duh:
 
Last edited:

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
koch_cha said:
Every one Want Warne in their team.Just look at his performance aganist india and u will know how bad a bowler he is. u have to perform aganist the best that a spinner will face not the aganist the english who doest even know how to play a spinner!!!!!.

Warne aganist india in 11 matches
Balls Runs Wickets Avg Wkt/Match Run/Over 5 W/I Best
3085 - 1608 - 29 - 55.45 - 2.64 - 3.13 - 0 - 4-47

Warne aganist England in 26 matches
Balls Runs Wickets Avg Wkt/Match Run/Over 5 W/I Best
7792 - 3040 - 132 - 23.03 - 5.08 - 2.34 - 7 - 8-71
:duh: :duh:
Yes, let's disregard the other 330 wickets @ 24.16 with 16 five-wicket hauls and 4 ten-wicket hauls. After all, England and India are the only other teams that matter... :rolleyes:
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
CDAK said:
Remember, only the team effort made aus the world champ and ur batting line up is no better than anyother test playing nations(other thean Bangladesh and Zimbabwe) .
I disagree - IMO one of the top 2 line ups by a long way.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
jamesryfler said:
Is the problem really the batting ?

In Brisbane, Australia had India 3-62, then let them make 400+.

In Adelaide, Australia had India 4-85, then let them make 500+ ?

Good point - the back-up bowling appears to be the problem?
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Linda said:
I am interested to know your thoughts on this question amits...
If Waugh, Hayden, Ponting, Langer, Martyn and Gilchrist were to travel to India and decide to live there, do you, in your opinion, think that they would be able to get into the current Indian side?
Hayden and Langer, Ponting and Gilchrist yes, the rest no.
 

Top