I'm not talking about bowling more overs in the day, I'm talking about actually bowling the number of overs that should be bowled.How many other sports let players play for 6 to 7 hours per day though? Especially fastbowlers?
They are not machines
This already exists. Play often gets started earlier or extended later to compensate for lost time. There are a couple of pages dedicated to this in the ICC Test Playing Conditions.I think there needs to be more flexibility in the playing conditions to allow start and finishing times to alter due to the weather.
I'm not talking about adding overs. I'm talking about bowling 90 overs in a day.I can see the case for make up time but surely yesterday is proof enough that even the most ironclad forecast can't be minute-perfect and you can't be pre-emptively adding overs.
Yeah I'm for that, particularly in England - in most other places it wouldn't make much difference though because of light.I'm not talking about adding overs. I'm talking about bowling 90 overs in a day.
There should be no cut off time - if conditions are OK, play on until the 90 overs are completed.
too late David Warner is doing the wormMan I can’t remember a more hollow draw in a while. I hope the aussies aren’t celebrating this retaining the ashes for now and knuckle down for the next few days and mentally ready for the last test
Perhaps they start incorporating reserve days in test cricket like ODIs sometimes have. If the total number of over lost to bad weather exceeds a session then you carry a session over into day 6, up until a full day's playThis already exists. Play often gets started earlier or extended later to compensate for lost time. There are a couple of pages dedicated to this in the ICC Test Playing Conditions.
Can't do a thing if the rain doesn't stop tho
I'm not specifically relating it to this test. It's rained for 2 days solid more or less, there's not alot you can do to.counter that.This already exists. Play often gets started earlier or extended later to compensate for lost time. There are a couple of pages dedicated to this in the ICC Test Playing Conditions.
Can't do a thing if the rain doesn't stop tho
That has more got to do with poor over rates from England bowlers on first day. Not sure if Australia was guilty of the same.I'm not specifically relating it to this test. It's rained for 2 days solid more or less, there's not alot you can do to.counter that.
But for the first 3 days, play finished when 90 overs hadn't been bowled - that shouldn't happen.
Times of play are never moved as a pre-emptive measure - ie the forecast for the last couple of hours is very poor, so let's move the start time forward an hour to maximise playing time.
It's not rocket science.
The problem with that also as someone said yesterday. That disadvantages the other teamYeah I'm for that, particularly in England - in most other places it wouldn't make much difference though because of light.
I think everyone is equally bad on this these days. Both Australia and India were taking the piss with their over rates during the WTC final.That has more got to do with poor over rates from England bowlers on first day. Not sure if Australia was guilty of the same.
I was more thinking along the same lines as Ashes81, but if you add half an hour because of weather that never comes, can’t you just end the following day half an hour early?I can see the case for make up time but surely yesterday is proof enough that even the most ironclad forecast can't be minute-perfect and you can't be pre-emptively adding overs.
What if it's day 5?I was more thinking along the same lines as Ashes81, but if you add half an hour because of weather that never comes, can’t you just end the following day half an hour early?